Re: Strange behavior around guix package --show

2020-01-05 Thread Jacob MacDonald
> It should now be fixed with commit > ba42da245bdb50aa98eecfeea8d207cefa209d48. Fixed indeed. (Wish I understood why it only failed as non-root but oh well.)

Re: Strange behavior around guix package --show

2020-01-03 Thread Pierre Neidhardt
It should now be fixed with commit ba42da245bdb50aa98eecfeea8d207cefa209d48. -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Strange behavior around guix package --show

2020-01-03 Thread Pierre Neidhardt
Pierre Neidhardt writes: > I think I found a dependency cycle: > > javascript.scm -> lisp-xyz.scm -> gtk.scm -> pdf.scm -> javascript.scm. No this is not the issue. The issue is that uglify-js inherits from sbcl-cl-uglify-js, in thus it must be defined in the same module. So I'll move them toge

Re: Strange behavior around guix package --show

2019-12-30 Thread Jacob MacDonald
> How can I reproduce this? That's what I'm trying to figure out myself. I know I can reproduce it across pulls, but only in my environment (and not yet as root). Given the information about dependency cycles, I can look into Guile behavior which I am not versed at all with. >> Hmm... I'm experi

Re: Strange behavior around guix package --show

2019-12-30 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Pierre Neidhardt writes: > Hmm... I'm experiencing a similar issue on 83870c3. I can reproduce this. -- Ricardo

Re: Strange behavior around guix package --show

2019-12-30 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Jacob MacDonald writes: > guix package --show is failing for me for packages which reference > sbcl-cl-uglify-js. This has been happening for a few guix pull generations, > but only occurs in my user's Guix profile. Running the same command as root > or through ./pre-inst-env (on the same versi

Re: Strange behavior around guix package --show

2019-12-30 Thread Pierre Neidhardt
I think I found a dependency cycle: javascript.scm -> lisp-xyz.scm -> gtk.scm -> pdf.scm -> javascript.scm. What's the best option here? I could move uglify-js back to lisp-xyz.scm. Or move it to a separate uglify-js.scm file. Thoughts? -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ signature.a

Re: Strange behavior around guix package --show

2019-12-30 Thread Pierre Neidhardt
Hmm... I'm experiencing a similar issue on 83870c3. --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ guix show sbcl-alexandria Backtrace: In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 222:29 19 (map1 (((gnu packages gettext)) ((gnu packages ghostscript)) ((gnu packages gl)) ((gnu packages glib)) ((g

Re: Strange behavior around guix package --show

2019-12-26 Thread Jacob MacDonald
I'm still experiencing the issue as of a9650f113527a1f7175ce0ae1026941ece13352e. The changes you mention seem to be the most likely culprit, but I've made no further progress in debugging.

Re: Strange behavior around guix package --show

2019-12-21 Thread Jacob MacDonald
Thanks, I'll have to pull down the most recent build when I'm on a more robust connection. After some more log-reading I think I've narrowed the problem down, though I'm not sure what the cause is. The root profile and my user profile are unique (this is probably trivial and intended), but share al

Re: Strange behavior around guix package --show

2019-12-21 Thread Pierre Neidhardt
Hi, I don't have an answer, but for what it's worth I've recently moved uglify-js to a different module. This probably has to do with your issue. -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Strange behavior around guix package --show

2019-12-20 Thread Jacob MacDonald
guix package --show is failing for me for packages which reference sbcl-cl-uglify-js. This has been happening for a few guix pull generations, but only occurs in my user's Guix profile. Running the same command as root or through ./pre-inst-env (on the same version of the tree) doesn't cause an err