Re: Reproducible bootstrapping

2016-07-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Leo Famulari skribis: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 09:34:30AM +0200, t3sserakt wrote: >> Am 04.07.16 um 18:46 schrieb Efraim Flashner: >> >> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 06:01:51PM +0200, t3sserakt wrote: >> >> Hi Ludo, >> >> >> >> thx for your quick reply, but no. >> >> >> >> I was talking about repr

Re: Reproducible bootstrapping

2016-07-05 Thread Leo Famulari
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 09:34:30AM +0200, t3sserakt wrote: > Am 04.07.16 um 18:46 schrieb Efraim Flashner: > > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 06:01:51PM +0200, t3sserakt wrote: > >> Hi Ludo, > >> > >> thx for your quick reply, but no. > >> > >> I was talking about reproducible builds like it is mention

Re: Reproducible bootstrapping

2016-07-05 Thread t3sserakt
Am 05.07.2016 10:11 schrieb l...@gnu.org: t3sserakt skribis: I was talking about reproducible builds like it is mentioned here: https://lwn.net/Articles/663954/ Currently a large fraction (no exact figure yet) of the packages are bit-reproducible, but it’s not 100%. For example, the .go fi

Re: Reproducible bootstrapping

2016-07-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
t3sserakt skribis: > I was talking about reproducible builds like it is mentioned here: > > https://lwn.net/Articles/663954/ Currently a large fraction (no exact figure yet) of the packages are bit-reproducible, but it’s not 100%. For example, the .go files produced by Guile are not bit-reprodu

Re: Reproducible bootstrapping

2016-07-05 Thread t3sserakt
Am 04.07.16 um 18:46 schrieb Efraim Flashner: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 06:01:51PM +0200, t3sserakt wrote: >> Hi Ludo, >> >> thx for your quick reply, but no. >> >> I was talking about reproducible builds like it is mentioned here: >> >> https://lwn.net/Articles/663954/ >> >> Cheers >> >> t3sserak

Re: Reproducible bootstrapping

2016-07-04 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 06:01:51PM +0200, t3sserakt wrote: > Hi Ludo, > > thx for your quick reply, but no. > > I was talking about reproducible builds like it is mentioned here: > > https://lwn.net/Articles/663954/ > > Cheers > > t3sserakt > based on my experience with the aarch64 bootstrap

Re: Reproducible bootstrapping

2016-07-04 Thread t3sserakt
Hi Ludo, thx for your quick reply, but no. I was talking about reproducible builds like it is mentioned here: https://lwn.net/Articles/663954/ Cheers t3sserakt Am 04.07.16 um 17:31 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > Hi, > > t3sserakt skribis: > >> are the bootstrap binaries reproducible? > Yes, in t

Re: Reproducible bootstrapping

2016-07-04 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, t3sserakt skribis: > are the bootstrap binaries reproducible? Yes, in the sense of . Does that answer your question? Ludo’.

Reproducible bootstrapping

2016-07-04 Thread t3sserakt
Hi *, are the bootstrap binaries reproducible? Cheers t3sserakt