Re: guix pull performance

2023-12-01 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, If I read correctly, your machine is: a reasonably powerful machine (Core i7, 12 cores, 16G RAM, 1 TB SSD drive with plenty of available space) Correct? On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 22:07, Emmanuel Beffara wrote: > Now, even if I didn't expect a significant improvement, I am st

Re: guix pull performance

2023-11-28 Thread Emmanuel Beffara
Hello again, De Simon Tournier le 12/10/2023 à 19:02: > On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 15:51, Emmanuel Beffara wrote: > > > Thanks for the pointer. Now I think I understand the reason for this > > behaviour: Guix has to compile the whole set of modules, including all > > package > > definitions, and it

Re: guix pull performance

2023-10-15 Thread Ignas Lapėnas
Hi, I’m fairly new to the Guix scene, but recently there was a discussion about it on devel-g...@gnu.org mailing list. So far it works as designed, because every time you use guix pull, they have to recompile every package definition. I’m a complete pleb when it comes to guile development, so take

Re: guix pull performance

2023-10-12 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 15:51, Emmanuel Beffara wrote: > Thanks for the pointer. Now I think I understand the reason for this > behaviour: Guix has to compile the whole set of modules, including all package > definitions, and it is rather slow at that. So I guess I won't expect > significant

Re: guix pull performance

2023-10-12 Thread Emmanuel Beffara
De Ignas Lapėnas le 12/10/2023 à 13:24: > I’m fairly new to the Guix scene, but recently there was a discussion about it > on devel-g...@gnu.org mailing list. So far it works as designed, because every > time you use guix pull, they have to recompile every package definition. > I’m a complete pleb