Re: AUR for GuixSD (was: GuixSD on arm (ng0))

2016-07-06 Thread Thompson, David
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:15 AM, David Craven wrote: > I was under the impression that that was one of the statements Jookia > made. You calling it the gnu system reinforced that impression. Sorry > if I misunderstood. Glad to hear that's not the case. :-) Big > discussion over nothing then =P I r

Re: AUR for GuixSD (was: GuixSD on arm (ng0))

2016-07-06 Thread David Craven
I was under the impression that that was one of the statements Jookia made. You calling it the gnu system reinforced that impression. Sorry if I misunderstood. Glad to hear that's not the case. :-) Big discussion over nothing then =P

Re: AUR for GuixSD (was: GuixSD on arm (ng0))

2016-07-06 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
David Craven writes: > So how rigid are you on the gnu system thing? Was jookia right that > you won't accept patches that will make guixsd a gnu system or > something else? ;-) I did some work on using musl as a libc on nixos > for embedded systems, I came here because I thought it was more > h

Re: AUR for GuixSD (was: GuixSD on arm (ng0))

2016-07-06 Thread David Craven
Hi Ricardo, Thanks for the info. I do maintain my private packages using GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH too. So how rigid are you on the gnu system thing? Was jookia right that you won't accept patches that will make guixsd a gnu system or something else? ;-) I did some work on using musl as a libc on nixos f

AUR for GuixSD (was: GuixSD on arm (ng0))

2016-07-05 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi David, > I don't see guixsd as a linux distro but more as a linux distro > building kit. I cannot resist… :) We see GuixSD as a variant of the GNU system. (I think the term “linux distro” had its run and can be retired now.) > Also on a related issue. At some point we may want something lik

Re: GuixSD on arm (ng0)

2016-07-05 Thread David Craven
Many projects use email for patch submission, so for me it's just another useful skill to learn. I assumed that sending the patches via email was the easy part. So whatever works best for you guys... ;-) On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: > Hello, > > Leo Famulari writes:

Re: GuixSD on arm (ng0)

2016-07-05 Thread ng0
Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 03:04:56PM +0200, David Craven wrote: >> Just chiming in here... >> >> I know that github being propietary software probably won't be >> considered, but it is unarguably an awesome piece of software, >> possibly the best propietary software since goo

Re: GuixSD on arm (ng0)

2016-07-05 Thread Alex Sassmannshausen
Hello, Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 03:04:56PM +0200, David Craven wrote: >> Just chiming in here... >> >> I know that github being propietary software probably won't be >> considered, but it is unarguably an awesome piece of software, >> possibly the best propietary software s

Re: GuixSD on arm (ng0)

2016-07-05 Thread Leo Famulari
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 03:04:56PM +0200, David Craven wrote: > Just chiming in here... > > I know that github being propietary software probably won't be > considered, but it is unarguably an awesome piece of software, > possibly the best propietary software since google search :-) I think > that

Re: GuixSD on arm (ng0)

2016-07-05 Thread David Craven
s?=) >3. Re: udev rules and system configuration > (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) >4. Re: Reproducible bootstrapping (t3sserakt) >5. Re: GuixSD on arm (t3sserakt) >6. Re: GuixSD on arm (ng0) > > > ---

Re: GuixSD on arm (ng0)

2016-07-05 Thread David Craven
. Re: udev rules and system configuration > (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) >4. Re: Reproducible bootstrapping (t3sserakt) >5. Re: GuixSD on arm (t3sserakt) >6. Re: GuixSD on arm (ng0) > > > --