Hi,
Vasilii Smirnov writes:
> Oh, nice, I completely missed that page. Thanks! Although it would be
> nice if it went into more detail... Like, I see that both "build" and
> "build-system" parts define the "${name}-build" function
> (e.g. cmake-build). But the definitions are different.
>
> The w
On 5/14/24 12:24, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
Hello Vasilii. In addition to Hartmut’s recommendation to imitate,
there also is a manual section; run
info "(guix)Source Tree Structure"
or visit
https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Source-Tree-Structure.html
explaining what gui
Hello Vasilii. In addition to Hartmut’s recommendation to imitate,
there also is a manual section; run
info "(guix)Source Tree Structure"
or visit
https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Source-Tree-Structure.html
explaining what guix/build/…-build-system are:
(guix build gnu-build-sy
Am 11.05.24 um 16:45 schrieb Vasilii Smirnov:
where ${name} can be "cmake", or "node", etc... So, the question is:
what's the reason for this split?
For building, parts need to be "packaged" and put into the
build-environment. (Can't tell which directory is which one.)
If I want to write
I've noticed that build systems in Guix are split in two parts:
- guix/build-system/${name}.scm
- guix/build/${name}-build-system.scm
where ${name} can be "cmake", or "node", etc... So, the question is:
what's the reason for this split?
If I want to write a new build system, what code should I
