Re: AUR for GuixSD

2016-07-13 Thread David Craven
Yep that makes sense. I am kind of a half backer since I easily get distracted by other things. I trying to improve in this area and not just doing a submit and forget kind of thing. David

Re: AUR for GuixSD

2016-07-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! David Craven skribis: > So how rigid are you on the gnu system thing? Was jookia right that > you won't accept patches that will make guixsd a gnu system or > something else? ;-) As Ricardo wrote, we accept all free software packages. We favor the GNU ones when there’s a choice, which m

Re: AUR for GuixSD (was: GuixSD on arm (ng0))

2016-07-06 Thread Thompson, David
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:15 AM, David Craven wrote: > I was under the impression that that was one of the statements Jookia > made. You calling it the gnu system reinforced that impression. Sorry > if I misunderstood. Glad to hear that's not the case. :-) Big > discussion over nothing then =P I r

Re: AUR for GuixSD (was: GuixSD on arm (ng0))

2016-07-06 Thread David Craven
I was under the impression that that was one of the statements Jookia made. You calling it the gnu system reinforced that impression. Sorry if I misunderstood. Glad to hear that's not the case. :-) Big discussion over nothing then =P

Re: AUR for GuixSD (was: GuixSD on arm (ng0))

2016-07-06 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
David Craven writes: > So how rigid are you on the gnu system thing? Was jookia right that > you won't accept patches that will make guixsd a gnu system or > something else? ;-) I did some work on using musl as a libc on nixos > for embedded systems, I came here because I thought it was more > h

Re: AUR for GuixSD

2016-07-06 Thread Kete Foy
David Craven: > I > think telling non developers to go buy this wifi card if you want to > use the gnu system or else we won't help you is kind of not very > user-friendly. > > I think hackers see it as being user-unfriendly if they supported hardware that disrespected computer users, and the ar

Re: AUR for GuixSD (was: GuixSD on arm (ng0))

2016-07-06 Thread David Craven
Hi Ricardo, Thanks for the info. I do maintain my private packages using GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH too. So how rigid are you on the gnu system thing? Was jookia right that you won't accept patches that will make guixsd a gnu system or something else? ;-) I did some work on using musl as a libc on nixos f

AUR for GuixSD (was: GuixSD on arm (ng0))

2016-07-05 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi David, > I don't see guixsd as a linux distro but more as a linux distro > building kit. I cannot resist… :) We see GuixSD as a variant of the GNU system. (I think the term “linux distro” had its run and can be retired now.) > Also on a related issue. At some point we may want something lik