Re: How to check Guix servers have Ungoogled-Chrome substitutions for me?

On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 05:14:19PM +, znavko--- via wrote: > some heavy package (like Icecat or Ungoogled-Chromium or LibreOffice0 > is compiling from sources. > I want to see this. And then I want to solve to prevent compilation of > LibreOffice, Chromium, Icecat if they are to be compiled.

Re: How to check Guix servers have Ungoogled-Chrome substitutions for me?

Le Sat, 27 Feb 2021 17:14:19 +, znavko--- via a écrit : > Hello, Guix Help! Hello! > I often run `guix pull && guix package -u` and sometimes it tooks too > much time, and my fan is noisy because some heavy package (like > Icecat or Ungoogled-Chromium or LibreOffice0 is compiling from > sou

Re: How to check Guix servers have Ungoogled-Chrome substitutions for me?

Hello, Am Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 05:14:19PM + schrieb znavko--- via: > Is there some 'guix' command run that will download updates and will check > which packages are to be > substitued, and which are to be compiled? guix package -n -u (where -n is a shortcut for --dry-run) does this. It is

Re: How to check Guix servers have Ungoogled-Chrome substitutions for me?

Hello, On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 6:14 PM znavko--- via wrote: > Is there some 'guix' command run that will download updates and will check > which packages are to be > substitued, and which are to be compiled? I think you'll find relevant informations here: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/26608 But

How to check Guix servers have Ungoogled-Chrome substitutions for me?

Hello, Guix Help! I often run `guix pull && guix package -u` and sometimes it tooks too much time, and my fan is noisy because some heavy package (like Icecat or Ungoogled-Chromium or LibreOffice0 is compiling from sources. It's a pity, because to get the newest version of such is not included

Re: cl-asdf: where is its asd file?

Answering your original post, wouldn't it be easier and better to just use Guix' SBCL? signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: cl-asdf: where is its asd file?

> My bad, ASDF indeed has an .asd file: > > https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/asdf/asdf/-/blob/master/asdf.asd So does this mean that there is a bug in Guix, or at least something worthy of a feature request?

Re: Información.

On Saturday, February 27, 2021 3:03 AM, Omar David Colmenarez Calabuig. wrote: > Buenas Luis. > > El 26/2/21, Luis Felipe luis.felipe...@protonmail.com escribió: > > > Buenos días, tardes o noches, Omar. > > > > > Buenas, soy un usuario nuevo en GNU Guix y me gustaría saber la > > > siguiente in

Re: javadoc not in jdk?

Vincent Legoll writes: > you should try adding the "doc" output from the jdk > > see https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/guix.html#Packages-with-Multiple-Outputs Thanks that was the clue I needed - for future readers the exact solution was: (native-inputs `(("openjdk:jdk" ,openjdk14 "jdk"))) javad

Re: javadoc not in jdk?

The syntax would be ("jdk-doc" ,openjdk "doc"), but if you mean the javadoc program, then it's the "jdk" output, which also contains the java compiler (icedtea and openjdk only contain java, not javac). Le 27 février 2021 06:14:43 GMT-05:00, Vincent Legoll a écrit : >Hello, > >you should try a

Re: javadoc not in jdk?

Hello, you should try adding the "doc" output from the jdk see https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/guix.html#Packages-with-Multiple-Outputs something like the following: (native-inputs `(("openjdk" ,openjdk14) ("jdk-doc" ,openjdk:doc))) Tchuss -- Vincent Legoll

javadoc not in jdk?

Hi all, I'm trying to create a package for python-jcc: https://pypi.org/project/JCC/ I've overcome a few hurdles, but am now stuck on a seemingly simple question. javadoc doesn't appear to be part of the openjdk or icedtea packages (I think this unusual?). Could anyone suggest the canonical way