Hi David,
> I don't see guixsd as a linux distro but more as a linux distro
> building kit.
I cannot resist… :) We see GuixSD as a variant of the GNU system. (I
think the term “linux distro” had its run and can be retired now.)
> Also on a related issue. At some point we may want something lik
myglc2 writes:
> I am running Guix/Debian from this git checkout ...
>
> g1@e3b:~/dev/guix$ git branch -av | grep '* master'
> * master fda746b gnu: menu-cache: Update to
> 1.0.1.
>
> g1@e3b:~/dev/guix$ stat /home/g1/.config/guix/latest | grep File:
> File: ‘/
I am running Guix/Debian from this git checkout ...
g1@e3b:~/dev/guix$ git branch -av | grep '* master'
* master fda746b gnu: menu-cache: Update to
1.0.1.
g1@e3b:~/dev/guix$ stat /home/g1/.config/guix/latest | grep File:
File: ‘/home/g1/.config/guix/latest’ -
Many projects use email for patch submission, so for me it's just
another useful skill to learn. I assumed that sending the patches via
email was the easy part. So whatever works best for you guys... ;-)
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Alex Sassmannshausen
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Leo Famulari writes:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:53:14AM +0200, t3sserakt wrote:
> That would be very kind. I would endeavor that your work will not be for
> nothing.
> Like Alex I also had the experience, that you need a lot of patience
> when participating
> in free software development. There are a lot of volunteer w
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 03:04:56PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
>> Just chiming in here...
>>
>> I know that github being propietary software probably won't be
>> considered, but it is unarguably an awesome piece of software,
>> possibly the best propietary software since goo
Jookia <166...@gmail.com> writes:
> - Patches would get lost regularly.
Yeah, this is still a problem for me. Many patches slip by because I
have no capacity to review them in time. I have settled on reviewing
things that I feel I’m a little more qualified to review than others,
such as R pack
Hello,
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 03:04:56PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
>> Just chiming in here...
>>
>> I know that github being propietary software probably won't be
>> considered, but it is unarguably an awesome piece of software,
>> possibly the best propietary software s
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 03:04:56PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> Just chiming in here...
>
> I know that github being propietary software probably won't be
> considered, but it is unarguably an awesome piece of software,
> possibly the best propietary software since google search :-) I think
> that
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 09:34:30AM +0200, t3sserakt wrote:
> Am 04.07.16 um 18:46 schrieb Efraim Flashner:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 06:01:51PM +0200, t3sserakt wrote:
> >> Hi Ludo,
> >>
> >> thx for your quick reply, but no.
> >>
> >> I was talking about reproducible builds like it is mention
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:23:07AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Howdy Jookia,
Thanks for your reply! I just want to follow up to elaborate on a few things:
> Jookia <166...@gmail.com> skribis:
>
> > - Patches would get lost regularly.
>
> Lack of responsiveness is terrible, but I think it’s
I don't see guixsd as a linux distro but more as a linux distro
building kit. Sure there are default options for new users, but the
idea behind guix was to be like emacs right? So freedom and
hackability are the most important core values here, including the
freedom of choice of bootloader.
Also o
Hey Jookia,
You might not be looking for this kind of email, but I wanted to send it
anyway, feel free to ignore…
I'm sorry to hear you feel the project is currently not set up to help
people like you contribute. Obviously I cannot speak for the project,
as I'm rather involved on the sidelines (
Just chiming in here...
I know that github being propietary software probably won't be
considered, but it is unarguably an awesome piece of software,
possibly the best propietary software since google search :-) I think
that using github would improve the efficiency of submitting/reviewing
patches
Hi,
thanks for your reply Jookia.
This message makes it more clear to me why you quit/no longer
consider the other project a while (some months?) ago.
While I can not understand all of it, I have sympathy and can
understand the current decisions you made.
Further below a comment on some topics.
Am 05.07.2016 10:11 schrieb l...@gnu.org:
t3sserakt skribis:
I was talking about reproducible builds like it is mentioned here:
https://lwn.net/Articles/663954/
Currently a large fraction (no exact figure yet) of the packages are
bit-reproducible, but it’s not 100%. For example, the .go fi
Hello!
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>>> Here’s an idea, which might be bad: how about adding a feature to load
>>> and merge a directory tree of configuration files as they are? For
>>> example, if I had a directory “/etc/guix/system/udev/ru
Am 05.07.16 um 00:18 schrieb Jookia:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 05:14:56PM +, ng0 wrote:
>> t3sserakt writes:
>>
>>> Hi Ludo,
>>>
>>> I would like to help, but I have no idea where to start.
>>> I am "just" an application developer, and do not have
>>> the right knowledge for doing this task alo
Howdy Jookia,
Jookia <166...@gmail.com> skribis:
> - Patches would get lost regularly.
Lack of responsiveness is terrible, but I think it’s easy to complain
about it until one gets involved in patch reviews.
Also, some reviews are more difficult than other: adding support for
another bootloader
t3sserakt skribis:
> I was talking about reproducible builds like it is mentioned here:
>
> https://lwn.net/Articles/663954/
Currently a large fraction (no exact figure yet) of the packages are
bit-reproducible, but it’s not 100%. For example, the .go files
produced by Guile are not bit-reprodu
Am 04.07.16 um 18:46 schrieb Efraim Flashner:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 06:01:51PM +0200, t3sserakt wrote:
>> Hi Ludo,
>>
>> thx for your quick reply, but no.
>>
>> I was talking about reproducible builds like it is mentioned here:
>>
>> https://lwn.net/Articles/663954/
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> t3sserak
21 matches
Mail list logo
