Hi,
IANAL as well, but the intent of the AGPL is that if you host the
software on a server in a modified form (e.g. you run a cloud node) then
you also have to publish the modified source code even if you did not
distribute the program (you only offered the service through an API).
Now, "usi
Yes, AGPLv3+ is a viral license and that extends to software as a
service/webpages built with it. Also, you wouldn't give your users any
privacy or informational self-determination if you don't make your
software free software.
On 11/15/23 14:42, Augusto A. Cognigni wrote:
I'm not a lawyer so
I'm not a lawyer so I'm asking you.
Since gnunet is under AGPL does that mean that any site or application I
develop that uses gnunet has to be AGPL? Or it can be closed source?
Enviado desde Proton Mail móvil
