On 11/8/24 10:02, retrovirus-...@juno.com wrote:
Hello gnunet,
I am starting about getting a domain name registry for a hostname.
After reading the user manual, I finally found the domain name
registrar link (https://fcfs.gnunet.org/ from
https://docs.gnunet.org/latest/users/gns.html#the-pin-zon
Please provide (a gzipped/compressed) attachment with your config.log,
that has key diagnostics for us. Thanks! -Christian
On 9/2/24 4:31 PM, marty1885 wrote:
Hi,
Congrats for releasing 0.22.0. I tried to build the code on my Arch Linux
server and ran into the following error during configura
On 4/18/24 06:04, statute_roulette...@simplelogin.com wrote:
Hello,
I have recently learned about GNUnet and am impressed with its ambitions.
However I have one question:
From my understanding GNUnet has its own link-layer implementation. Does this
mean that, theoretically, there could be du
Well, the NSE service *only* gives you an estimate of the size of the
network that is somewhat expensive for a Sybil attacker to inflate. It
is used by the DHT to "safely" tune certain internal parameters. I do
not know if it would be useful for Sybil mitigations beyond the DHT.
Also, please d
Yes. It's block-level replication. -Christian
On 2/23/24 17:37, Andrei Ușurelu wrote:
Good day! I have a question regarding the usage of the replication
level when publishing a file: what exactly does "the service pushes
blocks (for the file) to other peers" mean? Does it create copies of
the bl
The DHT will find your plugin automatically if it is installed in the
right directory and has a suitable file name following the naming
conventions. Your plugin must expose the right symbols with the correct
API, and then the DHT will basically 'ask' your plugin what block types
it is responsib
e, but not PEERSTORE.
În joi, 1 feb. 2024 la 23:43, Christian Grothoff <mailto:groth...@gnunet.org>> a scris:
Hi BB,
Peerstore is just a local database for information a peer keeps about
other peers (by their PeerIds, and yes, that's what you get as the CORE
ID an
Hi BB,
Peerstore is just a local database for information a peer keeps about
other peers (by their PeerIds, and yes, that's what you get as the CORE
ID and via the connect callbacks), it is *not* a DHT. The DHT is a
separate subsystem.
As it is the local (trusted) code storing information lo
gnunet-peerinfo has been removed, you likely have some ancient binary
around that -- when linked against more recent libraries -- breaks
badly. But at least in the current code gnunet-peerinfo doesn't even
exist anymore...
On 12/18/23 22:47, Big Boy wrote:
gnunet-peerinfo: symbol lookup error:
Yes, AGPLv3+ is a viral license and that extends to software as a
service/webpages built with it. Also, you wouldn't give your users any
privacy or informational self-determination if you don't make your
software free software.
On 11/15/23 14:42, Augusto A. Cognigni wrote:
I'm not a lawyer so
This usually happens if your datastore is too slow to keep up with the
number of queries you are receiving, so the queue builds up and is
eventually forcefully bounded. Switching to a different database _may_
help (depending on how much bandwidth you have...), but ultimately we're
aware that FS
Hi Marty,
The AGPL requires you to make the source code available, and we will not
allow linking of non-free code against GNUnet or the development of
SaaSS that would be in violation of the Affero GPL.
The goal of the GNU(net) project is to give users control over their
computing and data on the
On 10/20/22 17:26, Hendursaga wrote:
- I saw in the docs that gnunet uses proof-of-work in a couple places (NSE
and Revocation), would this work well on something like a smartphone? If not,
are there alternatives in the works?
There was a PhD position posted recently[2] concerning creating
Hi Maxime,
Why not configure the transport tcp or udp plugin to bindto localhost?
BINDTO = 127.0.0.1
That should do the trick, right? ;-)
-Christian
On 6/27/22 18:52, Maxime Devos wrote:
Hi,
Is there some recommend method to configure GNUnet such that it does
not contact the network (at cos
stro issue (that said, I still
think most likely you have a configuration issue that /usr/local/lib is
not searched by the linker as it should).
My 2 cents
Christian
On 04/06/2022 08:56, Christian Grothoff wrote:
Do you have /usr/local/lib in /etc/ld.so.conf?
-Christian
On 6/3/22 20:09,
Do you have /usr/local/lib in /etc/ld.so.conf?
-Christian
On 6/3/22 20:09, Willow Liquorice wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've decided to try and update the (hideously outdated) GNUnet
> installation on my system, and have ran into some trouble after
> completing the process: "gnunet-arm -s" crashes as it
On 3/1/22 2:19 PM, Bob Ham wrote:
> On 01/03/2022 13:07, Christian Grothoff wrote:
>> a Master's thesis
>
>> Florian's Bachelor's thesis
>
> I cannot believe you would seriously suggest that academic theses
> constitute software documentation.
I don
On 3/1/22 1:41 PM, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
>
> The website in general is a good starting point and it should lead into a
> (better) documentation.
> Even if that means that a lot of subsystems will not be documented anymore
> because
> the knowledge of them has been lost (looking at you rege
Hi,
Many GNUnet services are started 'on demand', so there is actually no
need to explicitly enable them. To get the minimum set of services, you
mostly need to disable the 'IMMEDIATE_START' option of applications you
do not want. Those will likely be the ones in the following sections:
RPS, REST
Well, if bootstrap gave you an error regarding recutils, do install GNU
'recutils' first ;-).
Beyond that, if configure still gives you trouble, do include the
configure output if you want us to be able to help...
On 1/20/22 12:39 AM, Josh Felix wrote:
>
> I already installed all of the dependen
Yes, that is the correct SHA-1 digest.
-Christian
On 12/8/21 1:44 AM, Calvin Heim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does the authentic gnunet.org Mumble server have a certificate matching the
> following records?
>
> Common Name: Murmur Autogenerated Certificate v2
> Valid from: Sat Oct 18 12:46:21 2014
> Valid
On 7/24/20 4:45 PM, Alessio Vanni wrote:
>
> The problem I'm facing is that due to the presence of CADET, I don't
> have an immediate way to associate a certain task with a certain reply,
> as CADET is another async operation.
>
> If really the only way (or the more correct) is to have the ID in
Hi Alessio,
I would like to help, but I doubt I fully understand your question! From
what I get, you want to do some action based on another peer sending you
a reply. So associating a unique number with the request that the other
peer is to include in the reply is indeed the right way to do this.
Looks to me like:
1) You have an old header/include file of GNUnet around, make sure you
have the latest version of Git installed and that this is the one
that is being used while compiling gnunet-ext
2) You may be lacking GNU gettext, or may have disabled GNU gettext
while compiling GNUne
Hi Aliessio,
I would assume that you are storing the 'struct GNUNET_CADET_Channel' in
one of your application's data structures. Simply store the closure in
the same data structure (or: make it that data structure -- that's
actually the usual design pattern to use).
That way, when _you_ call GNUN
On 6/13/20 6:47 PM, Alessio Vanni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a service which sends some data to a remote peer via CADET to a
> well known port. This data is preceded by a header with a bunch of
> informations, including a signature to verify that nothing happened
> while the data was being transm
Hi Jacki,
It's actually likely a combination of other peer's bandwidth settings
and CADET (and Transport) being still very, very bad in terms of
performance. t3sserakt is hoping to improve performance "soon" (however,
right now, there seems to even be a state machine issue where CADET can
complete
Hi!
Very little documentation on the regex documentation was ever written,
you can find it here:
https://docs.gnunet.org/handbook/gnunet.html#REGEX-Subsystem
Beyond that, there is Max's MS thesis, which I just rebuild from SRC
(with some trouble, build may not be perfect) and put up on
https://g
Hi!
Ego names are _locally_ unique for the individual user, not _globally_
within GNUnet. Not sure which kind of 'unique' you were asking about.
What you propose seems to be a migration path from GnuPG to GNS. In this
context, I would suggest you should try to find out what pEp is doing:
they hav
ss to the thesis that would be great.
>
> Thanks,
> Vikas Maurya
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:27 PM Christian Grothoff <mailto:groth...@gnunet.org>> wrote:
>
> On 2/20/20 9:51 PM, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
> > grothoff may know more about topology
On 2/20/20 9:51 PM, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
> grothoff may know more about topology and testbed though.
>
I don't recall either. Sree might recall, or his MS thesis might
document this. Or the code ;-)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2/10/20 6:17 PM, Vikas Maurya wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> I suppose the option you are saying to set are to be set in config file.
> My question is do I need to create a different file for each peer (which
> doesn't seem realistic if I have more no. of peers) or should I create a
> one config file
Hi Vikas,
Your attempt to start two peers with the testbed driver worked. The
various warnings you are getting are related to specific configuration
issues (binaries not being SUID, old DSTJ-file lying around somewhere)
which you should be able to safely ignore.
The only real issue is that you di
On 10/16/19 6:47 PM, Alessio Vanni wrote:
> I have a client which can send arbitrary data to a service. This data
> can be of any size and in particular I expect it to generally be larger
> than `GNUNET_MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE'. The service can also do something
> similar over CADET (sending large data
On 9/18/19 9:52 PM, Alessio Vanni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As part of an application I'm writing, some messages are exchanged
> between peers through CADET. Due to some design choices of the
> application, I need to sign these messages so that the recipient can
> verify that they were not tampered wit
I've added the missing "" tags in the instructions now. Thanks for
reporting. -C
On 8/20/19 7:08 AM, stanz via Help-gnunet wrote:
> A big Hello & Thank you...for working on gnunet!
>
> Following install instructions:
> https://gnunet.org/en/install-on-debian9.html.
> My OS is 'Devuan', a 'Debian'
Hi!
It's not your fault, I recently introduced a regression there. If you
pull 'gnunet-gtk.git' as of _today_, I've pushed a fix.
Best,
Christian
On 6/18/19 12:40 PM, my.trash...@mailbox.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can someone help me with this error message:
>
> user@GNUnet:~$ gnunet-fs-gtk
> Jun 1
Thanks for reporting. I've pushed a potential fix in
1d2b751c5..9d0035b23. Please let us know if it doesn't work.
On 3/16/19 10:42 AM, Amiri Houssem wrote:
> i want to compile gnunet for arm-linux-androideabi, when i type make i
> got this error does any one have solution to solve this problem ?
>
the work of many people. The following people
contributed code and were thus easily identified: Christian Grothoff,
Matthias Wachs, Bart Polot, Sree Harsha Totakura, Nathan S. Evans,
Martin Schanzenbach, Julius Bünger, ng0, Philipp Tölke, Florian Dold,
Руслан Ижбулатов, tg(x), David Barksdale
On 1/28/19 8:01 PM, Alexandre Garreau wrote:
> On 2019-01-28 at 18:41, Christian Grothoff wrote:
>
> On 1/28/19 12:17 PM, Alexandre Garreau wrote:
>
> What about graph- rather than tree(hierarchy)-based reference
> system? for instance if I want galex.eu,
On 1/28/19 12:17 PM, Alexandre Garreau wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just found this article (in french, for those able to read it):
>
> https://linuxfr.org/users/apichat/journaux/salut-toto-salutation-regle-editoriale-et-nom-sur-internet
>
>
> I’m enjoyed to see GNS gains in interest, and think to kee
On 10/08/2018 08:14 PM, Diagon wrote:
>
> > Yes, we do indeed expect breaking revisions in the medium future.
>
> Christian - I'm taking you to mean that there will be breaking revisions in
> the "near to medium future."
Nope, when I write 'medium', I mean 'medium' and not 'near to medium'.
Yes, we do indeed expect breaking revisions in the medium future.
On 10/08/2018 06:18 PM, Diagon wrote:
> Are we continuing to expect breaking revisions to protocol?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Help-gnunet mailing list
H
On 10/07/2018 06:42 PM, Diagon wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Oct 2018 00:19:00 -0700 Christian Grothoff
> wrote
>
> > Hi Diagon,
> >
> > Thanks for the constructive feedback. I've been trying to get people to
> > put installation instructions
On 10/06/2018 04:08 PM, Diagon wrote:> I've been back 3 times. I
/really/ want to try this. I do think
> this project shows a particular fragmentation of useful information,
> leaving at least one reasonably competent person, even if not a
> developer, throwing up their hands.
Hi Diagon,
Thank
On 05/31/2018 01:32 PM, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> I've read and replied to that original email. About your mail sending
> problem to @gnu.org: with our gnunet mailinglist we have no sign-ups
> required, but gnu.org has something called "whitelisting" (or was it
> greylisting they use?). The non-techn
You must make sure that your filename ends in ".gnd", so please try
$ gnunet-download -o foo.gnd -R URI
-Christian
On 01/05/2018 11:47 PM, Mike Rosset wrote:
> I have, it still just downloads a directory file.
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:47 PM Christian Grothoff
>
Have you tried passing the "-R" option to gnunet-download?
On 01/05/2018 09:52 PM, Mike Rosset wrote:
> I've been hoping to move my ipfs workflow to gnunet for sometime.
> Unfortunately I can not figure out how to recursively download a
> published directory.
>
> Once I've shared a directory with
You should probably look at Tahoe LAFS.
On 07/06/2017 04:55 AM, Paul Jason wrote:
>
> Can this be done in Gnunet? Or is there a more appropriate platform I
> should look int?
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Help-gnunet mai
t followed the tutorial.
>
> I didn't specify a PREFIX because default is "/usr/local"...
>
>
> On 26.06.2017 17:34, Christian Grothoff wrote:
>> On 06/26/2017 04:15 PM, Vincent wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> thanks for your answer and yes I a
Yes, with export GNUNET_FORCE_LOG="NONE"
I've also now updated Git master to ensure the code compiles with
logging=no.
Thanks for reporting!
On 06/27/2017 04:55 PM, Vincent wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Can I disable the ERROR Messages too? :)
>
> On 27.06.2017 1
Ok, I should look into this. In the meantime:
export GNUNET_FORCE_LOG="ERROR"
also disables all warnings ;-)
On 06/27/2017 03:05 PM, Vincent wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to disable all the warning messages so I decided to disable
> logging when compiling gnunet
>
>> ./configure --enable-logging=no
On 06/26/2017 04:15 PM, Vincent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your answer and yes I already looked at the tutorial.
> Tutorial isn't working for me always...
>
> For example I'm not able to start the dht monitor tool.
>
>> Jun 26 16:07:13-886268 util-disk-7195 WARNING `stat' failed on file
>> `/ho
Hi!
You have seen doc/gnunet-c-tutorial.texi? Chapter 7 explains how to do
CORE-level connections to pass messages, and the CADET API is very
similar. As for examples, just grep for uses of the CADET and CORE APIs
in the code itself, and you ought to find plenty.
Happy hacking!
Christian
On 0
On 06/14/2017 02:00 PM, Vincent wrote:
> Hi,
> everytime I try to comile the testbed it doesn't work:
>
> gcc $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS -o testbed-test testbed_test.c -lgnunettestbed
> -lgnunetdht -lgnunetutil
> /tmp/ccZmNcYw.o: In function `service_connect_comp':
> testbed_test.c:(.text+0xe9): undefine
On 05/10/2017 10:44 AM, Fungi4All wrote:
>
>> > 3rd Do resolvconf, avahi, samba, tor, openvpn related to problems we
>> > may be experiencing or is it something relating to system problems?
>>
>> GNUnet should work regardless of you using other services. Naturally,
>> forcing _all_ of your traffi
Hi!
Sorry for the huge delay, but I'm insanely busy. Some answers below...
On 04/25/2017 12:09 PM, Fungilife wrote:
> Good to find you,
> Exciting project you have going which I never realized or new as much about.
> I am on debian testing on amd-64 and downloaded the packages relating to
> gnun
On 04/20/2017 09:29 PM, Zeb Thompson wrote:
> While the free exchange of information and content is great, it raises
> important questions regarding how artists such as musicians, producers,
> game designers, and writers are supposed to make a living if anybody can
> share and access their content
On 04/18/2017 01:12 PM, ng0 wrote:
>>> I have a few questions regarding GNUnet. I hope it is fine to post them
>>> here on the mailing list. Unfortunately, when visiting the FAQ website
>>> https://gnunet.org/faq-page I just get an emtpy page, so I couldn't
>>> figure out whether there are already
Grothoff, Christian. "Resource allocation in peer-to-peer networks:
> An excess-based economic model." Wirtschaftsinformatik 45.3 (2003):
> 285-292.
> [3] Bennett, Krista, et al. "Gnunet-a truly anonymous networking
> infrastructure." In: Proc. Privacy Enhancing Technolog
On 02/24/2017 02:04 PM, Ivan Vilata-i-Balaguer wrote:
> Christian Grothoff (2017-02-23 23:08:44 +0100) wrote:
>
>> Dear Ivan,
>>
>> First of all, 0.10.1-4 is like 3+ years old, so I'm likely to have
>> forgotten about some of the 350+ issues we've
On 02/24/2017 12:56 PM, Ivan Vilata-i-Balaguer wrote:
> Thanks for the info! I've been running ``gnunet-nse`` for a while and
> it seems to stick with only 2.0 peers, 1.0 LOG2 and 1.3 deviation. Is
> this normal, or maybe my node is failing to connect to other peers?
> It's currently behind a NAT
Dear Ivan,
First of all, 0.10.1-4 is like 3+ years old, so I'm likely to have
forgotten about some of the 350+ issues we've fixed since. Generally,
we right now recommend people (especially devs) to use the code from
Git, even though that's naturally somewhat unstable. That said, I just
had reas
On 02/22/2017 12:04 PM, Ivan Vilata-i-Balaguer wrote:
> Christian Grothoff (2017-02-21 13:43:56 +0100) wrote:
>
>> On 02/21/2017 11:04 AM, Ivan Vilata-i-Balaguer wrote:
>>>>> 7. The system is amenable to privacy-preserving analytics to check its
>>>>&g
On 02/21/2017 11:04 AM, Ivan Vilata-i-Balaguer wrote:
> Here we were thinking more about capturing some content into the
> network, but the alternative mesh infrastructure is another approach
> (though a very ambitious one). I started some tests with L2 WLAN links
> managed by GNUnet but was someh
On 02/21/2017 11:04 AM, Ivan Vilata-i-Balaguer wrote:
>>> 7. The system is amenable to privacy-preserving analytics to check its
>>> impact.
>> I'm not sure what you mean exactly, but these two sound fraught with
>> distractions. Tor has many people who worked on 7. We do have ideas
>> aro
On 10/11/2016 12:14 PM, ng0 wrote:
> So technically I do not
> speak on behalf of the GNUnet Project (I think you mean someone employed
> by iniria with this or the current project maintainer).
I just have to briefly chime in on this.
As the GNU maintainer, I am ultimately responsible (to GNU) f
Dear Jan,
The kinds of abuse you are concerned about seem to all be of a
commercial nature, and thus have less to do with the P2P overlay
network, but with the payment system. After all, who'd pay for those
kinds of services on Silk Road with their credit card?
For GNUnet, the payment system we
Dear Geeb,
Partially in recognition of this serious bootstrapping issue for GNS, we
have plans (but not much code to show for it yet) to "merge" GNS with
the GnuPG web-of-trust, which would allow us to help bootstrap GNS via
the existing WoT.
A second issue is that we need many applications using
On 07/10/2015 05:07 PM, Geeb wrote:
> I have got to the bottom of this problem and I think it is probably purely
> the Debian packaging that is faulty.
>
> I'll document it on this mailing list in case anyone else finds it useful,
> but I should probably let the Debian package maintainers know. It
We're back now. The hosting university had a planned long outage for
work/tests on the 200kV grid.
-Christian
On 07/04/2015 11:39 PM, kode...@tutanota.de wrote:
> Sorry to have to contact you via e-mail like this, but it seems that your
> website, gnunet.org is down and has been that way at leas
Thanks for reporting, I've filed a bug report to track the issue:
https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=3877
On 06/30/2015 09:47 PM, t3sserakt wrote:
> when running „make check“ on debian 8 in a VM I get
>
> =
>gnunet 0.10.1: src/peerstore/test-s
I'm not sure what exactly you are looking for -- each of the GNUnet
command-line tools ships with a man-page, which is the typical way for
how one documents a console-only environment IMO. So I really am not
sure what kind of docs are missing for you (OK, maybe TeXinfo would be
more GNU-ish ;-)).
On 06/01/2015 12:52 AM, demos wrote:
> Hi GNU folks,
>
> Does GNUnet work without connecting to: 131.159.74.67 and
> 2001:4ca0:2001:42:225:90ff:fe6b:d60 ?
> What is this connection for?
There are three possible connections you might be refering to.
When running 'gnunet-setup', we connect to gnun
Good point. So if you wanted to use the VPN or enable GNS via DNS
traffic interception using iptables, you'll need to have a sandbox that
is capable of giving the sandboxed process still rather broad
capabilities over the host OS so that it can do the required network
operations (like intercepting
Sure, sandboxing can help. We hoped to do this by shipping Apparmor
profiles (open bug report: https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=2004,
help writing profiles would be very welcome), but Firejail is certainly
another possibility. One could even combine the two, using Apparmor to
restrict GNUnet se
Hi!
It's not a mis-configuration, it's a mis-installation. Somehow you
managed to either not install the gnunet-gtk plugins, or they are in a
directory where they are not found.
Try re-running configure + make install and make sure to use the same
--prefix argument for both 'configure' runs (if
On 04/24/2015 08:05 AM, Antoine Guellier wrote:
> Dear GNUnet contributors/developers,
>
> I am a PhD student at Inria Rennes (France), and I come here to request
> more information on GNUnet. Indeed, I am to make a small talk in a week
> or so on the subject of my choosing at Deakin Uni (Australi
For the first warning, looks like your system was somehow receiving
traffic via an IPv6 address that your configuration does not specify.
Maybe your NAT even supports IPv6? I don't think we ever tested with
IPv6-NAT, and the config likely doesn't even have an option for that.
For the second warni
Hi!
Many options are really only for developers, those of interest to users
should be configurable using 'gnunet-setup'. For the other options, it
is generally a good idea to look at the
$PREFIX/share/gnunet/config.d/-folder (or equivalently the
"*.conf.in"-files in the sources), as this is where
~/.config/gnunet.conf, when I should be running
>
>> gnunet@Compy:~$ gnunet-setup -c /etc/gnunet.conf
>
>> instead. However, I've been unable to write to /etc/gnunet.conf
>> through either gnunet-config or gnunet-setup, despite gnunet
>> owning the file a
Things seem to be much better now, and I've restarted the peer at
gnunet.org with a version that does connect again (it had been running a
'broken' version for a few days, which might have prevented new peers
from bootstrapping, even if they ran an working version). AFAIK SVN
HEAD should also conn
Dear Calvin,
SVN HEAD is currently having some connectivity issues, which are my
current priority to address. I don't know which version you're using,
but if it is SVN HEAD it might do to wait a few days and update
(assuming I manage to find & fix the issue(s), it is top on my list though).
The g
Hi!
Yes, we have plans to support something like "hidden services"
eventually, but we have not really started in earnest on the
design process for that. What we do have is the idea of
replacing directory servers for random peer sampling with
BRAHMS (https://gnunet.org/brahms), and the use of GNS
Hi all,
We are trying to get a port-knocking extension into the Linux kernel,
which would be useful to obscure TCP services -- such as GNUnet or
Tor Bridges, and could use your help to collect data to help convince
the Linux people to adopt the latest patch.
As Knock uses two fields in the TCP he
On 02/08/2014 08:03 PM, Doug wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>Thanks for the prompt and helpful reply. I'm stoked that this is an
> alpha+ quality project; indeed, I'm eager to contribute where I can.
>
>My output of
> $ set | grep GNUNET
> is:
>
> GNUNET_PREFIX=/home//Applications/ThirdParty
On 02/08/2014 06:39 PM, Doug wrote:
> Hello GNUnet Helpers,
>
>I am working through installing and running GNUnet on Debian 7.2.
> I've been following the build instructions for Debian 7.3, but with
> installing the nettle and gstreamer* libraries "by hand" rather than
> using the testing and
The issue is that when you ran 'configure', either libgnurl or
libmicrohttpd was not found;
hence the 'gnunet-daemon-hostlist' binary was not built.
Happy hacking!
-Christian
On 02/06/2014 02:29 AM, Stefan Huchler wrote:
> I maybe will file a bug in the archlinux bug tracker.
>
> But because I
that GNUnet is now started using "gnunet-arm -s". GNUnet should be
stopped using "gnunet-arm -e".
Thanks
==
This release was the work of many people. The following people
contributed code and were thus easily identified: Alejandra Morales,
Andreas Fuchs, Bart Polot, Bruno
On 12/10/2013 10:08 PM, Moratinos Sébastien wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I missed many page of documentation.
> In particular all the configuration part.
> I did not see it :(
>
> Furthermore, I had problems with the French translation (bug Drupal).
>
> Then I am say "why the blog and the documentation a
On 12/08/2013 03:32 PM, Moratinos Sébastien wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I'm logged in the web site I see French translation :
> https://gnunet.org/philosophy
>
> but when I'm not logged, and I click on "Français", the text is in
> English, not in French.
>
> I think only logged user can see transla
On 12/08/2013 02:28 PM, Gérard Lamiraud wrote:
> Sorry, it's make check, not make test.
>
>"Writing a proper 'beginner guide' is on my list,
>but sadly not on top."
>
> I can start a beginner guide to contribute, but I must learn GNUnet
> before :)
>
>
> smoratinos@sebdebport:~$ gnunet-
On 12/08/2013 10:55 AM, Moratinos Sébastien wrote:
> 3 / ? is there a beginner guide ? How can I check that all works fine ?
> make test is ok, all test pass (except Bluetooth, because I have
> disabled that on my OS.)
> And next ?
'make test', or 'make check'? Also, if bluetooth is not detected
libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them.
>
> Sébastien Moratinos
>
> Le 06/12/2013 07:00, Matthias Wachs a écrit :
> Installing gnunet-gtk works fine on my system just running
> $./configure
> without any arguments.
> Gnunet is installed in /usr/
That error on line 123 is normal/harmless. Still, I think
I found something. Please try SVN 31106.
-Christian
On 12/05/2013 10:31 PM, Gérard Lamiraud wrote:
> yes I use
>
> --with-gnunet=SOMEDIRHERE
>
>
> In fact, an error happens during configure
> $ ./configure --prefix=$HOME/gnbuild --wi
That is odd, gnunet-gtk's configure should not have passed in this case.
Still, did you give --with-gnunet=SOMEDIRHERE to configure of gnunet-gtk?
Somehow configure must have found 'libgnunetutil', but now later the
compiler fails to find it, which I'm not sure I can explain.
Matthias, as you tri
On 11/22/13 01:07, James Cook wrote:
> Hi help-gnunet,
>
> I started up a gnunet (0.9.5a) peer two days ago. I have some questions.
>
> - The current network size estimate (gnunet-statistics -s nse) ranges
> between 8 and 406 depending on when I check it. I am currently
> connected to two peers
So yes, it is possible that 0.9.5a is already defunct, as SVN HEAD
broke compatibility.
Oh ok. Is there any release planned soon? Is svn trunk having major changes
nowadays, or stabilising?
Hard to say, that depends on the subsystem you're looking at. Still,
the one big major change is that
The problem is (most likely) that at this time quite a few peers already
run SVN HEAD with the ECC-based public keys, which is not compatible
with 0.9.5a. We also saw some of these warnings before introducing ECC,
but as we were planning to switch to ECDHE anyway, I never made an
effort to real
gnunet.org/forum
GNUnet Bug tracker
https://gnunet.org/bugs/
IRC
irc://irc.freenode.net/#gnunet
Thank you for your attention.
Happy hacking!
Christian Grothoff
___
Help-gnunet mailing list
Help-gnunet@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnunet
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo