CFEngine Help: Re: how is am_policy_hub class set?

2012-05-21 Thread no-reply
Forum: CFEngine Help Subject: Re: how is am_policy_hub class set? Author: Jason Consorti Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,25933,25993#msg-25993 Looks like it is set in the source (looking at the community version of 3.3), during the bootstrapping process and subsequently durin

Rare/exotic operating systems support

2012-05-21 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Good day. I'd like to know is there anyone who uses CFEngine 3 on the following operating systems: - SCO OpenServer - SCO UnixWare - QNX - Cray/UNICOS Those systems will be dropped in 3.4.0 unless there are active users. -- Mikhail Gusarov ___ Help-

CFEngine Help: Strange error message

2012-05-21 Thread no-reply
Forum: CFEngine Help Subject: Strange error message Author: daveseff Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,25995,25995#msg-25995 Periodically I'm getting emails from random systems with the following message. My configs are complex and I'm not sure where to look. What causes this

CFEngine Help: Re: Bug in readstringarray with big field ?

2012-05-21 Thread no-reply
Forum: CFEngine Help Subject: Re: Bug in readstringarray with big field ? Author: jbdenis Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,25946,25996#msg-25996 I've created a bug entry : https://cfengine.com/bugtracker/view.php?id=1132 ___ Help-cfe

Re: Rare/exotic operating systems support

2012-05-21 Thread Neil Watson
QNX is the new base for Blackberries IIRC. Would be good to support that for future embedded opportunities. -- Neil Watson Linux/UNIX Consultant http://watson-wilson.ca ___ Help-cfengine mailing list Help-cfengine@cfengine.org https://cfengine.org/mail

Re: Rare/exotic operating systems support

2012-05-21 Thread Marco Marongiu
Hi Mikhail On 21/05/2012 15:28, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > I'd like to know is there anyone who uses CFEngine 3 on the following > operating > systems: > > - SCO OpenServer > - SCO UnixWare > - QNX > - Cray/UNICOS > > Those systems will be dropped in 3.4.0 unless there are active users. > An h

Re: CFEngine Help: Strange error message

2012-05-21 Thread Aleksey Tsalolikhin
Can you replicate this by running "cf-agent -K" from the command line? If so, "cf-agent -Kv" (verbose mode) should pin-point where this is coming from. But I suggest you open a ticket on bug.cfengine.com, an error like that should have a file name and line number in it, to make it easier to locat

Re: CFEngine Help: Re: CFEngine Help: git promises

2012-05-21 Thread Ted Zlatanov
One more improvement: the .git/config file is now enforced :) This means that it's pretty much impossible for an attacker to make you check out the wrong thing, even if they can modify the .git/config file (they can always exploit a race condition, but it's still an improvement). But it seems lik

Re: CFEngine Help: Re: CFEngine Help: git promises

2012-05-21 Thread Nick Anderson
Ted Zlatanov wrote: >One more improvement: the .git/config file is now enforced :) > >This means that it's pretty much impossible for an attacker to make you >check out the wrong thing, even if they can modify the .git/config file >(they can always exploit a race condition, but it's still an >imp

Re: CFEngine Help: Re: CFEngine Help: git promises

2012-05-21 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Mon, 21 May 2012 15:21:20 -0400 Ted Zlatanov wrote: TZ> But it seems like `this.promise_filename' refers to the top-level TZ> (i.e. runme.cf) filename, even though the vcs_freshclone promises are TZ> made in a different file. This makes it impossible to find templates TZ> relative to the ske

Re: CFEngine Help: Re: CFEngine Help: git promises

2012-05-21 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Mon, 21 May 2012 15:51:11 -0400 Ted Zlatanov wrote: TZ> On Mon, 21 May 2012 15:21:20 -0400 Ted Zlatanov wrote: TZ> bundle agent vcs_freshclone(prefix) TZ> { TZ> vars: TZ> "bundle_home" string => dirname("$(this.promise_filename)"), TZ> policy => "overridable"; TZ> } TZ> is called from A/

execresult and order

2012-05-21 Thread Irwan Hadi
I need to make a cf3 policy where the input of a bundle will consist of 2 parameters out of /etc/inputparameter The format of /etc/inputparameter will be config1a:config1b config2a:config2b ... The question now is what is the preferred way of doing this Should I create 2 set of execresult+splits