Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Private decrypt failed = padding check failed
Author: davidlee
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,24303,24303#msg-24303
(Set of 15 machines, all RHEL 5.6, all cfengine community 3.1.4)
>From time to time (every few days or so) the main cfengine serv
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: Policy Servers
Author: lauwersw
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,24302,24304#msg-24304
tjavo87 Wrote:
> - Do we need to bootstrap to both policy servers?
I wouldn't know why: bootstrapping is just making sure that you have some
initial code t
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: Policy Servers
Author: tjavo87
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,24302,24306#msg-24306
lauwersw Wrote:
---
> tjavo87 Wrote:
> > - Do we need to bootstrap to both policy
> servers?
>
> I wouldn
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:50:13 + (GMT) Mark Dixon
wrote:
MD> OK, so this works because of rule 5 of agent normal ordering ("The
MD> order of promises within one of the above types follows their top-down
MD> ordering within the bundle itself") from the reference manual?
MD> http://cfengine.co
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 05:28:10AM -0500, Marco Marongiu wrote:
>Hi
>
>I can't be as specific as lauwersw. I've been a cfengine2 user for some
>time, but my experience with cfengine3 is still too small.
>
>1) So, on a general note, and resuming what I already said in other
>threads, simple file edi
This is not true. The file editing has been greatly simplified in appearance
but it now a lot *more* powerful in cf3. It is expressed more convergently
however so more consistent syntax, unlike 2.
If you need some tips help us to improve the special topics guide on editing by
suggesting example
On 14/12/2011 09:45, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
> 3) Why is there a difference between global and local classes? In many cases
> I would prefer to have my local classes to be global. On the other hand I
> didn't see a case yet where I wanted a global class to be local. If you're
> afraid of na
On 14/12/2011 15:25, Nick Anderson wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 07:58 AM, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>> 1) allow passing body parameters as JSON, not just positional
>> parameters. Take the standard file permissions promise:
>>
>>"$(crond)/cfrun"
>>perms => mo("644","root");
>>
>> it instead b
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 03:11:25PM -0500, Mark Burgess wrote:
>This is not true. The file editing has been greatly simplified in appearance
>but it now a lot *more* powerful in cf3. It is expressed more convergently
>however so more consistent syntax, unlike 2.
Oh, that I agree with--the syntax
> vars:
> smb_shares slist => readstringlist(
> '/data/smb_shares.lst', '#',
> "\n\n",
> "1000",
> "64000");
> files:
> "/etc/samba/smb.conf"
> perms => mog('644','root','root'),
> create => true,
> template_from => template('/templates/smb.conf'),
> classes => { promise_repaired('bounce_smbd', 'b
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 03:46:40PM -0500, Mark Burgess wrote:
>
>> vars:
>> smb_shares slist => readstringlist(
>> '/data/smb_shares.lst', '#',
>> "\n\n",
>> "1000",
>> "64000");
>> files:
>> "/etc/samba/smb.conf"
>> perms => mog('644','root','root'),
>> create => true,
>> template_from => template
As far as I see my example is a direct translation of yours? No additional
steps... What am I missing?
--
Sent from my Android phone with probably ridiculous and involuntary spelling
corrections
Jesse Becker wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 03:46:40PM -0500, Mark Burgess wrote:
>
>> vars:
>> s
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: Policy Servers
Author: n...@cmdln.org
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,24302,24317#msg-24317
Does policy_server.dat support multiple entries? The generated bootstrap policy
doesn't appear so
___
Hel
On 14 December 2011 09:45, wrote:
> reports:
> any::
>
> This is not allowed, if you didn't know it yet. Still what everybody does
> now is this:
>
> reports:
> cfengine::
>
I knew about the any:: restriction, but not the workaround - thanks!
- Erlend
_
2011/12/14 Ted Zlatanov
>
> "$(crond)/cfrun"
> perms => "{ mode: 644, owners: ['root'] }";
>
A definitive +1 - as a Perl user, I've always missed this syntax shortcut.
It's compact and readable - I can't see any drawbacks with it.
- Erlend
_
Please forget you ever saw this.
This might look superficially attractive to a programmer but it suffers from
many problems, not the least of which would be a major increase in the size and
complexity of the parser. This approach does not satisfy the criteria for good
knowledge management. It a
16 matches
Mail list logo
