What format has package_list_update_ifelapsed? Does it need commas
("") ?
body package_method generic {
package_list_update_ifelapsed => 240;
...
...
}
Produce following error:
CheckParseInt(package_list_update_ifelapsed => 240/)
SplitString([],,=44)
Check ListLen
Fatal cfengine
Vasily,
in general, every parameter except nested calls (functions, compound
bodies, or edit_line bundles) must be enquoted ("").
body package_method generic {
package_list_update_ifelapsed => "240";
...
}
2010/6/7 Vasiliy G Tolstov :
> What format has package_list_update_ifelapsed? Does
В Пнд, 07/06/2010 в 13:57 +0400, Seva Gluschenko пишет:
> Vasily,
>
> in general, every parameter except nested calls (functions, compound
> bodies, or edit_line bundles) must be enquoted ("").
>
> body package_method generic {
>package_list_update_ifelapsed => "240";
>
>...
> }
I'm as
Well, it might mean that package_list_update_command haven't been
defined, or this parameter is restricted to certain package managers
list, or you've faced a bug. Cfengine developers must know better )
2010/6/7 Vasiliy G Tolstov :
> В Пнд, 07/06/2010 в 13:57 +0400, Seva Gluschenko пишет:
>> Vasil
В Пнд, 07/06/2010 в 14:19 +0400, Seva Gluschenko пишет:
> Well, it might mean that package_list_update_command haven't been
> defined, or this parameter is restricted to certain package managers
> list, or you've faced a bug. Cfengine developers must know better )
Hm... Can anyone from developers
I don't get any errors if I write:
package_list_update_ifelapsed => "240";# 4 hours
Check that there is no binary weirdness in your input file? Also check that you
have PCRE
and it is built with bison/flex. I have seen odd things happen with legacy
tools.
On 06/07/2010 01:44
I got an error on 3.0.4p2, but it seemed fine when I upgraded to 3.0.5a2.
Cheers,
--Nakarin
On Jun 7, 2010, at 2:23 PM, Mark Burgess wrote:
>
> I don't get any errors if I write:
>
> package_list_update_ifelapsed => "240"; # 4 hours
>
> Check that there is no binary weirdness in
В Пнд, 07/06/2010 в 14:23 +0200, Mark Burgess пишет:
> I don't get any errors if I write:
>
> package_list_update_ifelapsed => "240"; # 4 hours
>
> Check that there is no binary weirdness in your input file? Also check that
> you have PCRE
> and it is built
cf3 > Parsing file /v
В Пнд, 07/06/2010 в 14:33 +0200, Nakarin Phooripoom пишет:
> I got an error on 3.0.4p2, but it seemed fine when I upgraded to 3.0.5a2.
>
> Cheers,
> --Nakarin
I'm use 3.0.4... When 3.0.5 get officially available on the myspace
cfengine.org site?
--
Vasiliy G Tolstov
Selfip.Ru
__
Hi,
Remember to check if this has already been fixed in the bug tracker,
as it has in your case.
See https://cfengine.com/bugtracker/view.php?id=122
Going to bug.cfengine.com, clicking "View Issues" and searching for
e.g. "Fatal cfengine error: INTERN" would have shown you this.
Fix will be include
Right noW! :)
On 06/07/2010 02:35 PM, Vasiliy G Tolstov wrote:
> В Пнд, 07/06/2010 в 14:33 +0200, Nakarin Phooripoom пишет:
>> I got an error on 3.0.4p2, but it seemed fine when I upgraded to 3.0.5a2.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --Nakarin
>
> I'm use 3.0.4... When 3.0.5 get officially available on the mysp
Version 3.0.5 of the Cfengine 3 community edition source code is released
--
To download, please go to:
http://www.cfengine.org/pages/source_code
cfengine-3.0.5.tar.gz
MD5 41a76533251709c6a261430c1e1b5762
SHA1 3d014c410ad
В Пнд, 07/06/2010 в 14:49 +0200, Mark Burgess пишет:
> Version 3.0.5 of the Cfengine 3 community edition source code is released
> --
>
> To download, please go to:
>
> http://www.cfengine.org/pages/source_code
> cfengine-3
В Пнд, 07/06/2010 в 14:44 +0200, Mark Burgess пишет:
> Right noW! :)
>
> On 06/07/2010 02:35 PM, Vasiliy G Tolstov wrote:
> > В Пнд, 07/06/2010 в 14:33 +0200, Nakarin Phooripoom пишет:
> >> I got an error on 3.0.4p2, but it seemed fine when I upgraded to 3.0.5a2.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> --Nakarin
>
В Пнд, 07/06/2010 в 14:49 +0200, Mark Burgess пишет:
> Version 3.0.5 of the Cfengine 3 community edition source code is released
> --
>
After upgrade server to 3.0.5 , my client servers can't connect with it:
client:
f3 Lo
Seems like your client changed its IP address after cf-key run.
Mark, it seems like IP assertion check must be moved back beyond
skipverify check, otherwise troubles may happen for multihomed hosts
and/or when a host changes its IP (i.e. it would need key
regeneration).
2010/6/7 Vasiliy G Tolstov
В Пнд, 07/06/2010 в 17:52 +0400, Seva Gluschenko пишет:
> Seems like your client changed its IP address after cf-key run.
>
Not thinking. Because i'm delete all keys and re-create it.
> Mark, it seems like IP assertion check must be moved back beyond
> skipverify check, otherwise troubles may ha
On 07-06-10 16:57, Bas van der Vlies wrote:
>>> I am using cfengine community edition 3.0.4 and i get this error/warning.
>>> But the class can not be true, because the environent variable is set.
>>> {{{
>>> !! Redefinition of a constant variable "CLUSTER"
>>> Promise (version 1.0.1) belongs t
Pity you didn't suggest this an hour earlier. But ok.
Seva Gluschenko wrote:
> Seems like your client changed its IP address after cf-key run.
>
> Mark, it seems like IP assertion check must be moved back beyond
> skipverify check, otherwise troubles may happen for multihomed hosts
> and/or when
Hello,
In the reference manual I found that array can be of type scalar or
list, but I did not manage to use list iteration:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
body common control
{
bundlesequence => { "test" };
version => "0.0.2";
}
bundle agent test
{
va
Hi all,
I'd like to generate a report of all* changes Cfengine makes on systems
for auditing and awareness purposes. If, for example, the same change is
being made a lot on a system (e.g. fixing /etc/passwd permissions), then
we would know something is wrong and could investigate it more deeply.
Hi Justin,
I considered also this approach, but instead I've set up a webdav server
on a policy_server, and each client sending the reports on this webdav
entry point. Hence the client can send it when he knows it is suitable,
and the promises are much more easy to write
Nicolas
Justin Lloyd
Careful, such a `push' approach is unlikely to scale to more than a couple of
hundred
machines.
FYI, Nova 1.2 (scheduled for October) will take a delta approach to report
collection and
generation that will scale much better under pull for the full spectrum of
reports.
M
Nicolas Charles wrot
It is known that the iteration depth of variables is limited in
Cfengine. As of 3.0.4p2 the following test.cf
body common control
{
bundlesequence => { "outer", "inner" };
}
bundle agent outer
{
vars:
"arr[idx1]" string => "this is an array element";
"arr[idx2]" slist => { "This", "
24 matches
Mail list logo
