On 12 nov 2010, at 21:30, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
> Forum: Cfengine Help
> Subject: Re: problem with process_select and ttime
> Author: neilhwatson
> Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19220,19231#msg-19231
>
> FYI, you might wish to also include s
On 12 nov 2010, at 19:53, Daniel V. Klein wrote:
> No, I was worng (doh!). I am did more research into this, and it is not the
> selection issue as I suspected. I apologize for any misleading.
>
No that section is only used to set a class.
> There is something wrong with your range - 15 is n
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: problem with process_select and ttime
Author: neilhwatson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19220,19231#msg-19231
FYI, you might wish to also include sshd in the list of exceptions. Otherwise
SSH sessions other than root will be terminated
No, I was worng (doh!). I am did more research into this, and it is not the
selection issue as I suspected. I apologize for any misleading.
There is something wrong with your range - 15 is not "15 minutes" :-) You
should use "accumulated" on both sides of the irange.
On Nov 12, 2010, at 4:32
It is probably not a bug - it is a language (in)consistency. Well, maybe
that's a bug... let's see what Mark says?
You are promising two contradictory things, and that is the basic problem.
The first promise is that you will set a class "user_procs_out_of_range" if the
number of processes matc
version: community edition 3.1.0
os: debian
I want to kill processes that have accumulated more then 15 minutes of time:
body common control
{
bundlesequence => { example };
inputs => {
"cfengine_stdlib.cf"
};
}
bundle agent example {
processes:
