Tonight I build cf again from the latest trunk and now perms are not
altered unexpectedly. Did I make a mistake last night or was something
fixed in SVN today?
--
Neil Watson
Linux/UNIX Consultant
http://watson-wilson.ca
___
Help-cfengine mailing list
My point is that the promise is still changing permissions even though no
permissions are specifically promised. It seems that the agent defaults
to setting the target permissions to match the source permissions.
Sincerely,
--
Neil Watson
416-673-3465
help-cfengine-boun...@cfengine.org wrote o
I'm not sure what you are saying here.
Neil Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 07:28:58AM +0100, Mark Burgess wrote:
>>
>> Neil. You are correct that this option was not implemented. The
>> default value of all
>> boolean type /true/false options is always false, so preserving
>> original pe
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 07:28:58AM +0100, Mark Burgess wrote:
Neil. You are correct that this option was not implemented. The default value
of all
boolean type /true/false options is always false, so preserving original perms
should not
be the default behaviour. I have patched svn to fix this.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 07:28:58AM +0100, Mark Burgess wrote:
>Neil. You are correct that this option was not implemented. The default value
>of all
>boolean type /true/false options is always false, so preserving original perms
>should not
>be the default behaviour. I have patched svn to fix th
Neil. You are correct that this option was not implemented. The default value
of all
boolean type /true/false options is always false, so preserving original perms
should not
be the default behaviour. I have patched svn to fix this.
Neil Watson wrote:
> Here is a self contained example.
>
> ##
I'm running Community 3.0.3.
Sincerely,
--
Neil Watson
416-673-3465
CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING
This communication, including any attachments, is for the exclusive use of
addressee and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you
are not the intended recipient, any use, copying
Neil, please say which version you are running
M
Neil Watson wrote:
> Here is a self contained example.
>
> ##
> body common control {
> bundlesequence => { "test" };
> }
>
> bundle common g {
> classes:
>
> "all" expression => "any";
> }
>
> bundle age
Here is a self contained example.
##
body common control {
bundlesequence => { "test" };
}
bundle common g {
classes:
"all" expression => "any";
}
bundle agent test {
files:
"/tmp/foobar"
copy_from => local_cp("/tmp/src-foobar"),
Anyone?
Sincerely,
--
Neil Watson
416-673-3465
help-cfengine-boun...@cfengine.org wrote on 2009-12-31 14:36:23:
> Greetings,
>
> In discussing file promises it is suggested in the reference, and on
> this list, that sometimes it is desirable to have separate promises to
> mind the contents and
Greetings,
In discussing file promises it is suggested in the reference, and on
this list, that sometimes it is desirable to have separate promises to
mind the contents and permissions of a single file. In this way one can
be assured of the meaning of a promise kept class. I think I've found a
p
11 matches
Mail list logo
