On 15/06/12 16:32, Neil Watson wrote:
>> It's set to true, in fact. One clarification though: are you suggesting
>> >to remove/comment out the directive, or to set it to false?
> Remove/comment it.
OK, thanks. I'll test it immediately!
>> >When I'll put these policies in production, they'll have
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 04:26:04PM +0200, Marco Marongiu wrote:
>It's set to true, in fact. One clarification though: are you suggesting
>to remove/comment out the directive, or to set it to false?
Remove/comment it.
>When I'll put these policies in production, they'll have the grateful
>task to
On 15/06/12 16:20, Neil Watson wrote:
> This is slightly similar to a bug I saw when using IPV6. The trouble
> for me was skipidentify. If you have skipidentify => "true"; somewhere
> in your policy try removing it.
It's set to true, in fact. One clarification though: are you suggesting
to remov
This is slightly similar to a bug I saw when using IPV6. The trouble
for me was skipidentify. If you have skipidentify => "true"; somewhere
in your policy try removing it.
https://cfengine.com/bugtracker/view.php?id=988
>cf3> -> !! Package "puppet" cannot be verified -- no match
>cf3> -> !! P
On 14/06/12 20:23, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
> Marco, could you post the verbose output of cf-runagent, maybe we can
> get a clue what's going on from there.
That happened again, finally, and examining the output I found at least
one strangeness.
The file in attachment is a copy & paste from a
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: cf-runagent and keys
Author: zzamboni
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,26210,26214#msg-26214
Marco, could you post the verbose output of cf-runagent, maybe we can get a
clue what's going on from
Hi all
I have a strange problem with cf-runagent. I am pretty sure that it's my
fault but I can't see what I am doing wrong.
I want to be able to run cf-runagent on the policy host and request
clients to perform certain actions (either run cf-agent, plain, or run
it with certain classes defined,
