Oops...missed that part.
Sounds good. I like it. -Tod
On Sep 3, 2010, at 4:32 PM, Daniel V. Klein wrote:
> My complete proposal said "don't change the default behavior - only introduce
> the new behavior if you add the special control variable". So, I think the
> new behavior could safely b
My complete proposal said "don't change the default behavior - only introduce
the new behavior if you add the special control variable". So, I think the new
behavior could safely be introduced without worry, as it would be turned off by
default.
-Dan
On Sep 3, 2010, at 7:19 PM, Tod Oace wrote
On Sep 1, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Daniel V. Klein wrote:
>> /^($(regexes))$/ # The slist contains strings, but they are
>> expanded and then the result is interpreted as a regex
I like that. It's very familiar syntax, and solves the problem you describe of
controlling when regular expres
Mark-
I'm Cc'ing this to the mailing list so that the rest of user community can
chime in (since I may be barking up the wrong tree). This is in response to
the many bug reports I see which involve regex's (that are in fact, not bugs
but misunderstandings as to what are regex characters). It'
