Re: package_method options and bundle names

2010-02-09 Thread lefollfr
2010/2/9 Mark Burgess : > > Could be, you could try upgrading to svn Tested with SVN rev 785 : no more "Body type mismatch" indeed. No more conflict between body names and package_policy values. Great ! Frederic ___ Help-cfengine mailing list Help-cfeng

Re: package_method options and bundle names

2010-02-09 Thread Mark Burgess
Could be, you could try upgrading to svn lefollfr wrote: > Isn't it something similar to the problem described with variable > declaration in Bug-cfengine thread "Bug when using a string variable > with the same value as a perms body promise name" ? > _

Re: package_method options and bundle names

2010-02-09 Thread lefollfr
Isn't it something similar to the problem described with variable declaration in Bug-cfengine thread "Bug when using a string variable with the same value as a perms body promise name" ? ___ Help-cfengine mailing list Help-cfengine@cfengine.org https://cf

Re: package_method options and bundle names

2010-02-09 Thread lefollfr
Jonathan Clarke wrote : > It looks like you may need unique names for body and bundle items, even if > they are of the same type... Hello Jonathan, Thank you for the reply. But oops ... I notice that I wrote : package_method "update" ... where my problem is with : package_policy "update". In t

Re: package_method options and bundle names

2010-02-08 Thread Jonathan Clarke
Le 08/02/2010 12:53, Frédéric LE FOLL a écrit : > Hello, > > I have a "Body type mismatch" when I want to use package_method > "update". It happens when promises also contain a "bundle agent update" > and a "body agent update". > > The connection between the bundles names and valid package_method v