2010/2/9 Mark Burgess :
>
> Could be, you could try upgrading to svn
Tested with SVN rev 785 : no more "Body type mismatch" indeed. No more
conflict between body names and package_policy values. Great !
Frederic
___
Help-cfengine mailing list
Help-cfeng
Could be, you could try upgrading to svn
lefollfr wrote:
> Isn't it something similar to the problem described with variable
> declaration in Bug-cfengine thread "Bug when using a string variable
> with the same value as a perms body promise name" ?
> _
Isn't it something similar to the problem described with variable
declaration in Bug-cfengine thread "Bug when using a string variable
with the same value as a perms body promise name" ?
___
Help-cfengine mailing list
Help-cfengine@cfengine.org
https://cf
Jonathan Clarke wrote :
> It looks like you may need unique names for body and bundle items, even if
> they are of the same type...
Hello Jonathan,
Thank you for the reply.
But oops ... I notice that I wrote : package_method "update" ... where my
problem is with : package_policy "update".
In t
Le 08/02/2010 12:53, Frédéric LE FOLL a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I have a "Body type mismatch" when I want to use package_method
> "update". It happens when promises also contain a "bundle agent update"
> and a "body agent update".
>
> The connection between the bundles names and valid package_method v