On 26/06/12 15:14, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> Yup, that's exactly what skeleton.el does. Could you give me some
> templates you'd use and tell me what portions should be parameterized?
> I'll do the rest.
Here. As simple as they are, and the only parameter would be the bundle
name. I'd probably use ag
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 20:07:25 +0200 Marco Marongiu
wrote:
MM> On 22/06/12 20:05, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
>> Marco and others, do you want to suggest some good blank templates for
>> the various bundles and bodies? I'll take care of integrating them with
>> cfengine-mode.el. They'll be in the menus
On 22/06/12 20:05, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> Marco and others, do you want to suggest some good blank templates for
> the various bundles and bodies? I'll take care of integrating them with
> cfengine-mode.el. They'll be in the menus somewhere.
Personally, I'd be content with a plain template for al
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:47:23 -0500 Ron Parker wrote:
RP> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Marco Marongiu
wrote:
>> I found that having the promises laid out in normal order in the bundles
>> can help a lot in understanding how things actually go on when the
>> policy is run.
>>
>> It would be
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Marco Marongiu wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I found that having the promises laid out in normal order in the bundles
> can help a lot in understanding how things actually go on when the
> policy is run.
>
> It would be nice if we had a key combination that, once pressed, de
