y
> policy, which was the idea for having it in the first place.
>
> Unless I missing something else...
>
> Justin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: nwat...@symcor.com [mailto:nwat...@symcor.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 12:34 PM
> To: Justin Lloyd
> Cc: h
-Original Message-
From: nwat...@symcor.com [mailto:nwat...@symcor.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 12:34 PM
To: Justin Lloyd
Cc: help-cfengine@cfengine.org; help-cfengine-boun...@cfengine.org
Subject: RE: Defining classes using array values
Still wfm
[r...@unxxhd01 inputs]# cf-age
Still wfm
[r...@unxxhd01 inputs]# cf-agent -If ./foo.cf
Validation: Scalar item in built-in FnCall isvariable-arg => {
config[RUNTIME] } in rvalue is out of bounds (value should match pattern
[a-zA-Z0-9_$.]+)
R: config[RUNTIME] is a variable with value CONFIG!!
Validation: Scalar item in built-i
may be ok as an RHS value but not
LHS.
Justin
-Original Message-
From: nwat...@symcor.com [mailto:nwat...@symcor.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 12:15 PM
To: Justin Lloyd
Cc: help-cfengine@cfengine.org; help-cfengine-boun...@cfengine.org
Subject: RE: Defining classes using array v
You idea does seem to work. The error seems more like a warning.
cf3 + Private classes augmented:
cf3 + runtime_one
cf3
cf3 - Private classes diminished:
cf3
cf3
cf3
cf3=
cf3reports in bundle neil (1)
cf3
a bug.
Justin
-Original Message-
From: nwat...@symcor.com [mailto:nwat...@symcor.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 11:57 AM
To: Justin Lloyd
Cc: help-cfengine@cfengine.org; help-cfengine-boun...@cfengine.org
Subject: Re: Defining classes using array values
I get a similar message but stil
I get a similar message but still a report:
[r...@unxxhd01 inputs]# cf-agent -f ./foo.cf
Validation: Scalar item in built-in FnCall isvariable-arg => { foo[1] } in
rvalue is out of bounds (value should match pattern [a-zA-Z0-9_$.]+)
R: foo[1] is a variable with value one
Validation: Scalar item i
