On 16 March 2010 13:36, Mark Burgess wrote:
>
> Windows compatible binaries. No Cygwin.
>
> Great, I always thought requiring the Cygwin DLL was a hacky solution (even
though I am an avid Cygwin user myself). Congratuations, this should make
the solution more palatable to skeptic Windows centric
Windows compatible binaries. No Cygwin.
nwat...@symcor.com wrote:
> By 'native' support do you mean Windows compatible binaries or does Nova
> still run through Cygwin?
>
> Sincerely,
> --
> Neil Watson
> 416-673-3465
>
>
> -
Hi,
Nova does not need Cygwin, it is native Windows binaries.
I've been testing it, many thanks to the developers team, I find it is
much more convenient with a lot of nice features (I love the translate
path and the variables for each of Nova executable, and the services: type
Thank you !
Nic
By 'native' support do you mean Windows compatible binaries or does Nova
still run through Cygwin?
Sincerely,
--
Neil Watson
416-673-3465
CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING
This communication, including any attachments, is for the exclusive use of
addressee and may contain proprietary and/or confidentia
