On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:17 PM, wrote:
> Forum: Cfengine Help
> Subject: Re: Bundle and Body
> Author: mark
> Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,18931,19022#msg-19022
>
> Like this? http://www.cfengine.org/pages/syntax
Yes =) Combined with something in the introduction which e
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:05 PM, wrote:
> Forum: Cfengine Help
> Subject: Re: Bundle and Body
> Author: mark
> Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,18931,19021#msg-19021
>
> You could be right. I wondered about this. I am definitely not the right
> person to make that decision. Wha
Chris,
your notes are reasonable. I've changed "item" to "promise" to make it
clearer. Still I believe that it's not that easy to ignore "promise"
part. What important part is left from the description is the syntax
for calling edit_line bundles and compound bodies from the promises
description. I
> topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,18931,19016#msg-19016
>
>Mark,
>
>I propose to add my explanation from above to the reference. I believe
>it's clear enough.
This prompted me, as a struggling newcomer, to have another look at the topic.
It's very easy to ignore the "item" in that de
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:32 AM, wrote:
> Forum: Cfengine Help
> Subject: Re: Bundle and Body
> Author: periapt
> Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,18931,19007#msg-19007
>
> I agree with Fransusa that this is not clear. The documentation seems to
> emphasise the similarity betw
