On 08/23/2011 07:32 AM, David Lee wrote:
> cfengine distributes an "update.cf". That ought to be high quality and
> reliable. But what I find is that this DISTRIBUTED version seems not to
> have been written with flexibility in mind. In other words, the example
> code from cfengine, about its
Sjoerd Oostdijck wrote:
> On 8/22/11 10:36 AM, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
>> From the top-level, what I want is for "update.cf", when checking
>> "/var/cfengine/inputs", to try one server, and if that times out, then to
>> try another in the list.
>>
>> Now the "copy_from" compound body has a
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 02:41:30PM -0400, Sjoerd Oostdijck wrote:
>On 8/22/11 10:36 AM, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
>> From the top-level, what I want is for "update.cf", when checking
>> "/var/cfengine/inputs", to try one server, and if that times out, then to
>> try another in the list.
>>
>>
On 8/22/11 10:36 AM, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
> From the top-level, what I want is for "update.cf", when checking
> "/var/cfengine/inputs", to try one server, and if that times out, then to try
> another in the list.
>
> Now the "copy_from" compound body has a "servers" which takes a list, a
