Re: Question about classes

2011-06-22 Thread Bas van der Vlies
On 22-06-11 09:44, Bas van der Vlies wrote: > On 21-06-11 21:49, Seva Gluschenko wrote: >> I'm not sure if I've read you right, but if you mean that or => "" >> works and or => {} doesn't, perhaps, it's high time to file a bug >> report about that, because it must be strictly the opposite. >> R

Re: Question about classes

2011-06-22 Thread Bas van der Vlies
On 21-06-11 21:49, Seva Gluschenko wrote: > I'm not sure if I've read you right, but if you mean that or => "" > works and or => {} doesn't, perhaps, it's high time to file a bug > report about that, because it must be strictly the opposite. > That is correct the "" works and { } doesn't, see: {{

Cfengine Help: Re: Question about classes

2011-06-21 Thread no-reply
Forum: Cfengine Help Subject: Re: Question about classes Author: nba1314 Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,22490,22561#msg-22561 Yesterday I was in the game to buy equipment, the result has been deceived many Runescape Gold. Later, my friend told me that person in the long

Re: Question about classes

2011-06-21 Thread Seva Gluschenko
I'm not sure if I've read you right, but if you mean that or => "" works and or => {} doesn't, perhaps, it's high time to file a bug report about that, because it must be strictly the opposite. 2011/6/21 Bas van der Vlies : > > On 21 jun 2011, at 16:47, Seva Gluschenko wrote: > >> Well, or => must

Re: Question about classes

2011-06-21 Thread Bas van der Vlies
On 21 jun 2011, at 16:47, Seva Gluschenko wrote: > Well, or => must be followed by a list { }, and expression => must be > followed by a string "", definitely. Perhaps, your tests were > unsuccessful because of wrong definitions for expressions defining > NO_PBS_MOM and NODES. > Seva, Thanks

Re: Question about classes

2011-06-21 Thread Seva Gluschenko
Well, or => must be followed by a list { }, and expression => must be followed by a string "", definitely. Perhaps, your tests were unsuccessful because of wrong definitions for expressions defining NO_PBS_MOM and NODES. 2011/6/21 Bas van der Vlies : > On 17-06-11 16:17, Bas van der Vlies wrote: >

Re: Question about classes

2011-06-21 Thread Bas van der Vlies
On 17-06-11 16:17, Bas van der Vlies wrote: > > On 17 jun 2011, at 15:07, Seva Gluschenko wrote: > >> I'd rather rewrote it as follows: I have done some experiments and was a bit surprise over the outcome, maybe some can explain to me why some work and others not: * reference is: http://cfengi

Re: Question about classes

2011-06-17 Thread Bas van der Vlies
On 17 jun 2011, at 15:07, Seva Gluschenko wrote: > I'd rather rewrote it as follows: > > classes: > 'PBS_reg' expression => regcmp(".*r[0-9]+n[0-9].*"); > 'PBS_ok'not => classify("gb-r7n1.irc.sara.nl"); > 'PBS_MOM' and => { "PBS_ok", "PBS_reg", "${sys.host}" }; > > 2011/

Re: Question about classes

2011-06-17 Thread Seva Gluschenko
I'd rather rewrote it as follows: classes: 'PBS_reg' expression => regcmp(".*r[0-9]+n[0-9].*"); 'PBS_ok'not => classify("gb-r7n1.irc.sara.nl"); 'PBS_MOM' and => { "PBS_ok", "PBS_reg", "${sys.host}" }; 2011/6/17 Jesse Becker : > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 05:25:44AM -0400,

Re: Question about classes

2011-06-17 Thread Jesse Becker
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 05:25:44AM -0400, Bas van der Vlies wrote: >I want to define a classs like this: > classes: > "PBS_MOM" and => { !classify("gb-r7n1.irc.sara.nl"), regcmp( >".*r[0-9]+n[0-9].*", "$(sys.host)" ) }; > >This is not a valid syntax. Is it possible to set a class and

Question about classes

2011-06-17 Thread Bas van der Vlies
I want to define a classs like this: classes: "PBS_MOM" and => { !classify("gb-r7n1.irc.sara.nl"), regcmp( ".*r[0-9]+n[0-9].*", "$(sys.host)" ) }; This is not a valid syntax. Is it possible to set a class and use the 'not' operator? For me it would be useful or are there other w