Since you provide no information to work with, all I can say is "upgrade and
good look".
M
prashanth.gar...@kofc.org wrote:
>
> In one of my development configurations, I have a problem of having
> multiple cf-execd processes being spawned, very much similar to that
>
file
changes. Overall this approach is working well.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:54 AM, wrote:
>
>
> In one of my development configurations, I have a problem of having
> multiple cf-execd processes being spawned, very much similar to that
> discussed in the mail thread in the followin
How are you spawning multiple cf-execd's? In the thread you quoted I
wanted to make sure that cf-execd was running but that cf-execd -F was not
counted when considering that promise. Thus the negative look ahead
regex.
Sincerely,
--
Neil Watson
416-673-3465
CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING
This com
In one of my development configurations, I have a problem of having
multiple cf-execd processes being spawned, very much similar to that
discussed in the mail thread in the following URL:
http://www.mail-archive.com/help-cfengine@cfengine.org/msg00682.html
Request to please point me towards
