Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Package architecture specification being ignored by cf3
Author: eystein
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17577,20291#msg-20291
This was indeed a bug, see the status here:
https://cfengine.com/bugtracker/view.php?id=456
A patch has been submitt
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Package architecture specification being ignored by cf3
Author: daveseff
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17577,20288#msg-20288
Thanks Mark. Will do. I'm so used to posting here and old habits die hard... :)
-Dave
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Package architecture specification being ignored by cf3
Author: mark
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17577,20284#msg-20284
...but remembering to be more helpful, we are looking into it, and will check
whether the submitted patch is acceptable
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Package architecture specification being ignored by cf3
Author: mark
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17577,20283#msg-20283
David,
if you are a Nova support customer, please use the ticket system for enquiries.
___
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Package architecture specification being ignored by cf3
Author: daveseff
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17577,20282#msg-20282
I'm giving this another bump. I'd like some feedback on this patch as it is
quite important to my company, who has
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Package architecture specification being ignored by cf3
Author: daveseff
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17577,20091#msg-20091
I have managed to verify and fix the bug on my end. I'm submitting the diff
here for review. Mark B, I tried to fol
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Package architecture specification being ignored by cf3
Author: daveseff
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17577,20090#msg-20090
Here is my analysis,
Function PackageMatch() in verify_packages.c takes the (name, version, and
arch) of a packag
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Package architecture specification being ignored by cf3
Author: daveseff
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17577,20087#msg-20087
I've verified the issue in 3.1.2 as well. I am looking through the source now.
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Package architecture specification being ignored by cf3
Author: Seva Gluschenko
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17577,20085#msg-20085
As for me, it seems like the slist of architectures is treated as "or" list
instead of "and" list. Perhaps,
Forum: Cfengine Help
Subject: Re: Package architecture specification being ignored by cf3
Author: daveseff
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17577,20084#msg-20084
I'm giving this a bump, as I have the same issue on 3.0.5p1. It seems that if a
package of the same name, but diffe
10 matches
Mail list logo
