Re: CFengine Parser

2012-10-12 Thread Mark Burgess
Thanks, Bas. I will register a bug for this. In general, please use the bug tracker, rather than the mailing list to report omissions like this. M On 12/10/12 14:18, Bas van der Vlies wrote: I find cfengine3 much better then previous version (1 and 2), The only main concern for me is the p

CFengine Parser

2012-10-12 Thread Bas van der Vlies
I find cfengine3 much better then previous version (1 and 2), The only main concern for me is the parser and how it reports syntax errors, Previous cfengine versions had the same problem. A lot can improved in this area. The syntax for cfengine is clear and can easily be checked. It will also b