On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:05:13 +0200 (CEST) neilhwatson wrote:
n> I could kick whoever decided to use version numbers that are not
n> numbers. This is a number 2.334. This is not a number 3.4.3.
Please note 2.334 means a different number in many locales! This is
*not* a simple problem!
(relate
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: rpm_version package provider
Author: mikesphar
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,27409,27435#msg-27435
neilhwatson Wrote:
---
> And that's when you kicked him?
His point was valid though, that
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: rpm_version package provider
Author: neilhwatson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,27409,27432#msg-27432
And that's when you kicked him?
___
Help-cfengine mailing list
Help-cfengine@cfengine.org
https
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: rpm_version package provider
Author: mikesphar
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,27409,27431#msg-27431
neilhwatson Wrote:
---
> I could kick whoever decided to use version
> numbers that are no
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: rpm_version package provider
Author: neilhwatson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,27409,27420#msg-27420
I could kick whoever decided to use version numbers that are not numbers. This
is a number 2.334. This is not a number 3.4.3. Programmer
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: rpm_version package provider
Author: nickanderson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,27409,27418#msg-27418
nickanderson Wrote:
---
>
> cf3> Looking for an installed package older than
> (openss
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: rpm_version package provider
Author: nickanderson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,27409,27417#msg-27417
OOOph, I take it back, It installed something, but not what I thought. It
grabbed openssh-debuginfo instead of openssh
and I get similar w
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: rpm_version package provider
Author: nickanderson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,27409,27416#msg-27416
Thanks a lot Neil, I was able to get it working with that. I will have to sit
down and study the differences.
__
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: rpm_version package provider
Author: neilhwatson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,27409,27412#msg-27412
Nick,
See if this helps:
https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,25415,25418#msg-25418
___
Help-
On 09/18/2012 01:40 PM, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
> Forum: CFEngine Help
> Subject: Re: rpm_version package provider
> Author: neilhwatson
> Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,27409,27410#msg-27410
>
> I think that the trailing -1 might be a release rather part of the version.
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: rpm_version package provider
Author: neilhwatson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,27409,27410#msg-27410
I think that the trailing -1 might be a release rather part of the version.
Try the version as 5.9p1. See the stdlib for the actual RPM c
11 matches
Mail list logo
