ting to version 3 might be a good idea in any case, if you have
> time to learn 3. In 3, the language has been greatly streamlined and
> standardized; and it is more powerful and flexible than 2.
>
> Best,
> -at
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Rakesh Rajasekharan
&
the version number is 2.1.21 not 2.1.12. this was a typo. APologies for the
confusion.
Please let me know on the compatibility.
Thanks..
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Rakesh Rajasekharan <
rakesh.rajasekha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using Cfengine 2.1.12 RHE
Just to add to my previous mail.. I am using RHEL 6 64 bit.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Rakesh Rajasekharan <
rakesh.rajasekha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using Cfengine 2.1.12 RHEL 4 ,& 5. Can some one please confirm if
> Cfengine 2.1.12 is compatible o
Hi,
I am using Cfengine 2.1.12 RHEL 4 ,& 5. Can some one please confirm if
Cfengine 2.1.12 is compatible opon RHEL6.
Since RHEL 6 is recent one , I have my doubts. I have tried to comile it
but I got some library errors.
Also, I could not find any RPM's of Cfengine 2.1.12 for RHEL 6. RPMs were
a
