Re: Has anybody put together a body package_method cpan ?

2012-06-05 Thread Nick Anderson
On 06/05/2012 02:31 PM, Neil Watson wrote: > Well, there is your problem. Clearly you should have used camel and not > a goat. Wait, lambs have fallen out of favor? ___ Help-cfengine mailing list Help-cfengine@cfengine.org https://cfengine.org/mailman/l

Re: Has anybody put together a body package_method cpan ?

2012-06-05 Thread Neil Watson
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 03:23:10PM -0400, Jesse Becker wrote: >We tried to make a wrapper around cpan2rpm at one point. It kinda sorta >worked once in a while when the moon was full and we sacrificed a goat >first. Well, there is your problem. Clearly you should have used camel and not a goat.

Re: Has anybody put together a body package_method cpan ?

2012-06-05 Thread Jesse Becker
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 03:18:10PM -0400, Neil Watson wrote: >On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:51:26AM -0700, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote: >>Hi. Has anybody put together a body package_method cpan ? to >>interface with the perl CPAN library? > >I'd like to see that. Given that many CPAN installs can be

Re: Has anybody put together a body package_method cpan ?

2012-06-05 Thread Neil Watson
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:51:26AM -0700, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote: >Hi. Has anybody put together a body package_method cpan ? to >interface with the perl CPAN library? I'd like to see that. Given that many CPAN installs can be interactive this would be challenging. -- Neil Watson Linux/UNI

Has anybody put together a body package_method cpan ?

2012-06-05 Thread Aleksey Tsalolikhin
Hi. Has anybody put together a body package_method cpan ? to interface with the perl CPAN library? Best, Aleksey ___ Help-cfengine mailing list Help-cfengine@cfengine.org https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine

CFEngine Help: Re: Build 3.3.2 on Solaris10 x86 fail

2012-06-05 Thread no-reply
Forum: CFEngine Help Subject: Re: Build 3.3.2 on Solaris10 x86 fail Author: wpchiu Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,26084,26135#msg-26135 I just tried with sfw gcc 3.4.6 which come with more issues. sfw gcc 3.4.6 cannot build 64 bit address mode binary. I tried to build 32 bit