Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: Timing classes
Author: neilhwatson
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,22772,22815#msg-22815
I suggest you test. Package promises can be tricky.
___
Help-cfengine mailing list
Help-cfengine@cfengine.or
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: Installing CFEngine on windows
Author: zzamboni
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,22811,22814#msg-22814
Frost,
Does the compilation itself succeed, despite the warnings? Or does it stop
there?
Here's what I did to compile it under Win7, it's
Really? Huh... that's weird... I'd file a bug report with an example, if I
were you...
-Dan
On Jul 15, 2011, at 2:56 AM, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
> Forum: CFEngine Help
> Subject: Re: ${this.promiser} in comments
> Author: svenXY
> Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,22798
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: yum_rpm automatic package upgrades
Author: svenXY
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,22812,22812#msg-22812
Hi again,
I'm still struggeling with this.
This time, I'd like to find a solution to always upgrade a package if there is
a new one availabl
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Installing CFEngine on windows
Author: Frost
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,22811,22811#msg-22811
Hey there
I'm trying to install CFEngine on window with cygwin. But each time I try it
keeps failing on me, saying:
cf.extern.h:189: warning: '_t
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:44:08AM +0200, Mark Burgess wrote:
> On 07/15/2011 09:31 AM, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> > Seems to be a bug. Please open a bug in our bugtracker.
> [...] there is no difference in the way that () and {} are handled.
> Logically, there should be full symmetry between these c
On 07/15/2011 09:31 AM, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> On 15.07.2011 08:56, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
>
>> right, thanks for your thoughts on this, but apparently $(this.promiser) is
>> expanded all right whereas ${this.promiser} is not.
> Seems to be a bug. Please open a bug in our bugtracker.
>
>
On 15.07.2011 08:56, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
> right, thanks for your thoughts on this, but apparently $(this.promiser) is
> expanded all right whereas ${this.promiser} is not.
Seems to be a bug. Please open a bug in our bugtracker.
--
Mikhail Gusarov