Re: Cfengine Help: Looking for suggestions on ordering

2010-07-01 Thread Daniel V Klein
Heh - just use "set_variable_values" from cfengine_stdlib.cf! Or see how it is done there - it's rather clever (I wish I thought of it :-) -Dan > Forum: Cfengine Help > Subject: Looking for suggestions on ordering > Author: Authority > Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17628,1

Cfengine Help: Looking for suggestions on ordering

2010-07-01 Thread no-reply
Forum: Cfengine Help Subject: Looking for suggestions on ordering Author: Authority Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17628,17628#msg-17628 Normal ordering for edit_line bundles puts insert_lines before replace_patterns. For my current problem, I'm trying to reverse them. Giv

Re: Filesystem %s's content seems to be sensible as promised

2010-07-01 Thread Nicolas Charles
Marc Baudoin wrote: > Eystein Måløy Stenberg écrit : > >> This message will only be printed in inform mode (-I) like for any >> other promise. >> > [...] > >> You may choose from a varying number of verbosities (error, inform, >> verbose, debug). >> Maybe you have the level set in your

how to find key mis-match?

2010-07-01 Thread Evuraan
Connect to cf-master = on port 5308 cfengine:cf-client: BAD: keys did not match cfengine:cf-client: Authentication dialogue with cf-master failed cfengine:cf-client: Unable to establish connection with cf-master (failover) a few of my cfengine clients seem to have key mis-matches. whats the best

Cfengine Help: Re: Unix_GetInterfaceInfo() too slow to read > 100 ip's on one interface, possible solution?

2010-07-01 Thread no-reply
Forum: Cfengine Help Subject: Re: Unix_GetInterfaceInfo() too slow to read > 100 ip's on one interface, possible solution? Author: lero Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,17516,17625#msg-17625 Hi, Doing a deep look, the problem is not with nsswitch.conf entries. The server was

Re: Filesystem %s's content seems to be sensible as promised

2010-07-01 Thread Marc Baudoin
Eystein Måløy Stenberg écrit : > This message will only be printed in inform mode (-I) like for any > other promise. [...] > > You may choose from a varying number of verbosities (error, inform, > verbose, debug). > Maybe you have the level set in your policy somewhere. You're right: body agent

Cfengine presentation at the LSM 2010

2010-07-01 Thread Nicolas Charles
Hello everyone, The Libre Software Meeting (or Rencontres Mondiales du Logiciel Libre in French) is a french worldwide event (typical french paradox) focused on Free software and its uses. This year event is at Bordeaux (more details there : http://2010.rmll.info/ ) On the 7/7/2010, i'll be gi

Re: Filesystem %s's content seems to be sensible as promised

2010-07-01 Thread Eystein Måløy Stenberg
Hi, This message will only be printed in inform mode (-I) like for any other promise. Try e.g. the following policy. --- body common control { bundlesequence => {"test"}; } bundle agent test { storage: "/" volume => testv; } body volume testv { freespace => "10%"; sensible_size => "20K";

Filesystem %s's content seems to be sensible as promised

2010-07-01 Thread Marc Baudoin
Hi, When using a volume body in a storage promise, Cfengine (I'm using version 3.0.5) always sends a report saying: -> Filesystem %s's content seems to be sensible as promised Is it useful to know that everything's right? Wouldn't it be better to tell when things go wrong and not generate repor