Works fine on cfengine 3.0.3 svn755
Regards,
Nicolas
nwat...@symcor.com wrote:
> [r...@unxxhd01 inputs]# cf-promises -f ./promises.cf
> Validation: Int item on rhs of lval 'built-in FnCall ago-arg' given as {60
> => 60} is out of bounds (should be in [0,31])
>
> Relavent parts:
> files:
>
>
[r...@unxxhd01 inputs]# cf-promises -f ./promises.cf
Validation: Int item on rhs of lval 'built-in FnCall ago-arg' given as {60
=> 60} is out of bounds (should be in [0,31])
Relavent parts:
files:
"${g.workdir}/outputs"
delete => tidy,
file_select => days_old("60"),
(Resending to the entire list) I'm suggesting an email is only sent when
Cfengine attempts to repair a promise, not evaluate every single one.
And filtering would certainly be used, no matter what, I'm sure. :)
As for the nodename example, it depends on how you write the promise. If
you do
bundle
I don't see how this could scale. Even a small policy can have dozens of
promises. A email for each one would just flood my mailbox.
> For example, if I have a promise to ensure that a Solaris system?s
> hostname is in /etc/nodename, I should write the promise so that it
> doesn?t do anything
Hi all,
I've opened a ticket on this but I wanted to share my thoughts with the
community to see if anyone has had the same thought and perhaps has
already implemented something to this effect.
I'd like for Cfengine on each host to be able to send an email every
time it tries to repair a pr
Hi,
I'm wondering if there's a way to set the maximum number of fields
that edit_field will use. For example, I've written the following
bundle for setting values in a configuration file of the form "var
value" (e.g. sshd config file). It is based on set_variable_values
from stdlib, using a differ
++ for this idea. It would be very nice, and reduce duplication of
bundles in which the only difference is one parameter (for example,
I'm thinking of bundles for managing configuration files, some of
which use "var=value", others "var value" or "var:value", etc.)
--Diego
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2
Right - I have seen those, I was referring to Mark's personal blog, which I
find interesting but I couldn't find an RSS feed in it.
--Diego
-Original Message-
From: Brendan Strejcek [mailto:strej...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 9:54 AM
To: Zamboni, Diego
Cc: help-cfengi
The host is missing Bison or Yacc. Either is required to build CF but not
run. Flex is also required to build but not run. BTW, the latest version
is 3.0.3 not 3.0.2.
Sincerely,
--
Neil Watson
416-673-3465
CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING
This communication, including any attachments, is for the ex
By far one of the dodgiest tasks in Cfengine is authentication of this
nature. Since the errors says 'denied access' then the trouble likely
lies in the access_rules server bundle. Do you have any such rules?
Example:
bundle server access_rules {
vars:
unxxhd01::
"ad
Neil, Mark, and Nakarin,
I was mistakenly under the impression that 3.x was commercial and 2.x was
opensource and we wanted to evaluate before purchasing. I went back and looked
again and realized that 3.x is "community" -- not commercial.
I've downloaded 3.0.2 and it accepted our Berkeley i
I am trying to run cf-agent on host 10.27.41.150 by running cf-runagent on
10.27.41.199. Both hosts are running cf-serverd.
It looks like the key exchange is OK but then I get a "Server refusal due to
denied access to requested object."
Not sure how to fix this. I tried messing with the cfrun
Is there a reason you are evalutation the depreciated Cfengine 2.2.x? I
would recommend that you evaluate version 3 instead.
Sincerely,
--
Neil Watson
416-673-3465
CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING
This communication, including any attachments, is for the exclusive use of
addressee and may contain pro
You might need to add /usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.3/lib to /etc/ld.so.conf and run
ldconfig once.
Why don't you consider to use cfengine3 instead? Dunno what you think, but for
me, cfengine 2 is the past, 3 is the future. :-)
Cheers,
--Nakarin
On Feb 5, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Jim Gosney wrote:
> We ar
Neil,
Here is the exact command and reply that we are using:
pos089998-1:/jim/cfengine-2.2.10 # ./configure
--with-berkeleydb=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.3
...
checking for BerkeleyDB location in /usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.3...
/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.3
checking Berkeley DB Version... configure: error:
Perhaps you could give us a more details. Using --with-berkeleydb= as a
configure switch allows you to point to any Berkeley DB you like.
Sincerely,
--
Neil Watson
416-673-3465
CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING
This communication, including any attachments, is for the exclusive use of
addressee and m
We are trying to install CFEngine to evaluate it for possible use in our
environment but are running into issues with it seeing berkeley db.
We are trying ton install CFEngine 2.2.10.
The berkely db is 3.3.11 (we started out trying 4.8.26 but had the same
problem. thought maybe an older pre-o
17 matches
Mail list logo
