* Ed Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This might help:
>
> http://www.cfengine.org/docs/cfengine-Reference.html#lastseenexpireafter
I like the FriendStatus reporting, though dislike the notifications
about systems on DynamicAddresses subnets. Could cfengine be updated to
exclude reports from DynamicAd
I'd say it is improper behaviour considering that I might wanna know when permissions on such a file have changed without
getting email alerts every hour cause cfagent itself sets them to 600
and then to 644. I don't wanna know that so I have to turn the inform
flag off. However, if someone just me
Yes, I always get this in my current implementation... if I have a copy
directive with explicit permissions, the file copies and immediately
sets perms after copy to the correct ones. I don't get alerts on this
alone since it occurs on the same pass, only an extra line when a file
is actuall
Ok I narrowed it down and it turns out there is exactly one kind of file that this happens to.
Some files (/etc/hosts is one of them) have both a copy AND an editfiles directive in cfagent.conf f.e. :
control:
actionsequence = ( processes links files copy editfiles tidy )
copy:
$(confi
While it is not my intention to spam the list, I would simply like to send out a notification that my organization is offering commercial support for cfengine. We do onsite consulting, code reviews and custom solutions. If any of you or your employing organization would be interested in having
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 10:10 -0500, Brian E. Seppanen wrote:
> I have the following code
>
> classes:
> host_groupa::
> usera= ( ReturnsZero(/usr/bin/getent passwd usera) )
>
>
> shellcommands:
> host_groupa.!usera::
> "/usr/sbin/useradd -g usera -d /expor
Ed Brown wrote:
I never saw this come out on [any] list last Thursday, so retrying to
the new list... It's part reply, part suggestions for cfengine 3.
I'd add that over the last 5 years, I've seen a lot of otherwise good
programmers and admins struggle with embracing/adopting cfengine because
I never saw this come out on [any] list last Thursday, so retrying to
the new list... It's part reply, part suggestions for cfengine 3.
I'd add that over the last 5 years, I've seen a lot of otherwise good
programmers and admins struggle with embracing/adopting cfengine because
of difficulty unde
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Help-cfengine mailing list
Help-cfengine@cfengine.org
http://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
Atom Powers wrote:
> On 3/21/06, Jim Wight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > How about
> > usera = ( ReturnsZero(/bin/sh -c ${quote}/usr/bin/getent passwd usera
> > >/dev/null${quote}) )
> >
>
> Add to trap errors for truely silent operation: " ... >/dev/null 2>&1 ..."
I would recommend not us
On 3/21/06, Jim Wight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How about
> usera = ( ReturnsZero(/bin/sh -c ${quote}/usr/bin/getent passwd usera
> >/dev/null${quote}) )
>
Add to trap errors for truely silent operation: " ... >/dev/null 2>&1 ..."
> ___
> Help-cfe
Ed Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 10:10 -0500, Brian E. Seppanen wrote:
>
> > Does someone know of an easier way of testing for the existence of a
> > user that wouldn't require a call to getent? Just wondering if there
> > is a better solution out there.
>
> Don't know if this is better, bu
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 10:10 -0500, Brian E. Seppanen wrote:
> I have the following code
>
> classes:
> host_groupa::
> usera= ( ReturnsZero(/usr/bin/getent passwd usera) )
>
> So what that would do is evaluate a class usera if /usr/bin/getent passwd
> usera returns 0 if
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:10:33AM -0500, Brian E. Seppanen wrote:
> /dev/null. So that is the first question.how can I take output from
> the command passed to ReturnsZero and send it to /dev/null?
Create a small script that runs the getent and redirects the
result to /dev/null, but preserv
I have the following code
classes:
host_groupa::
usera= ( ReturnsZero(/usr/bin/getent passwd usera) )
shellcommands:
host_groupa.!usera::
"/usr/sbin/useradd -g usera -d /export/home/usera -s /usr/local/bin/scponly
-m -k /etc/skel usera"
So what that wo
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 13:54 +, Jim Wight wrote:
> The most recent run has reported as follows:
>
> *: Host x.x.x.x (hailed us) last at Sun Mar 19 23:39:41 2006
> i.e. not seen for 37.63 hours
> (Expected = 5184.63 secs (= 1.44 hours) (Expires 90 days)
>
> However, there is an
On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 15:06 -0600, Brendan Strejcek wrote:
> This is how I use FriendStatus on my policy server:
>
> control:
> LastSeenExpireAfter = ( 14 )
>
> alerts:
> policyhost::
> FriendStatus(24)
> ifelapsed=10080 # Warn no more often than once per week
I have
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 10:10 -0500, Brian E. Seppanen wrote:
> Does someone know of an easier way of testing
> for the existence of a user that wouldn't require a call to getent?
> Just wondering if there is a better solution out there.
Don't know if this is better, but it is quieter: you can a
18 matches
Mail list logo
