x27;]' from
the declarator and direct_declarator rules to the
declaration_specifiers rule, like this:
declaration_specifiers:
storage_class_specifier type_specifier
| type_specifier
| declaration_specifiers '*'
| declaration_specifiers '[' ']'
| dec
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Luca wrote:
> Tom Lieber ha scritto:
>> I'm creating a parser for a C-like language, basing it on this ANSI C
>> grammar:
>>
>> http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/ANSI-C-grammar-y.html
>>
>> I would like to change the syntax f
read in the "red dragon", it is better to use %left, %prec and
> similar keyword rather than grammar rules, because in the latter way the
> parser has many states.
Ahh, that book has been on my wish list. I think I should finally get it.
--
Tom Lieber
http://AllTom.com/
___
help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
LPAREN shift 9
SEMICOLON reduce 4
RPAREN reduce 4
--
Tom Lieber
http://AllTom.com/
___
help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
about splitting up the rule as in
the ANSI C grammar.
I found on another mailing list that a third fix is to set a
precedence for LPAREN, which has side-effects in other part of the
grammar I'm sure, but seems to solve the -a(b) and -a[b] problems
gracefully at least. I'm going to do this one for now (path of least
resistance...) and if problems turn up, I'll turn to splitting up the
rules.
--
Tom Lieber
http://AllTom.com/
___
help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
