> On 22 Sep 2022, at 08:30, Lukas Arsalan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> At 2022-09-22T07:08:55CEST Akim Demaille wrote:
>> This snippet is clearly ambiguous, since it allows two different parses of
>> -1, which -Wcex nicely showed.
>>
> yes. right.
>
>> If I were you, I would handle this in the scann
> On 22 Sep 2022, at 16:52, Lukas Arsalan wrote:
>
> On 2022-09-22T07:57:45UTC Hans Åberg wrote:
>> On 22 Sep 2022, at 08:30, Lukas Arsalan wrote:
>>> [1] -1 --> "num"
>>> [2] 1-2 --> "num" "-" "num"
>>> [3] (-1^-2) --> "(" "num" "^" "num" ")"
>>> [4] 1--2 --> "num" "-" "num"
>>> [5] 1---3 --
On 2022-09-22T07:57:45UTC Hans Åberg wrote:
> On 22 Sep 2022, at 08:30, Lukas Arsalan wrote:
>> [1] -1 --> "num"
>> [2] 1-2 --> "num" "-" "num"
>> [3] (-1^-2) --> "(" "num" "^" "num" ")"
>> [4] 1--2 --> "num" "-" "num"
>> [5] 1---3 --> "num" "-" "-" "num"
>> [6] 1-2^3 --> "num" "-" "num" "^" "num
> On 22 Sep 2022, at 21:02, Lukas Arsalan wrote:
>
> On 2022-09-22T15:54:31UTC Hans Åberg wrote:
>> Context switches are best avoided unless absolutely necessary, in my
>> experience.
>> So if one designs ones own language, it might be good to try to avoid them
>> by a change in the grammar.
On 2022-09-22T15:54:31UTC Hans Åberg wrote:
> Context switches are best avoided unless absolutely necessary, in my
> experience.
> So if one designs ones own language, it might be good to try to avoid them
> by a change in the grammar.
>
OK... I know that there are no signed numbers usually...
This is horrid, and not how math works. Spaces necessarily mean nothing, and
imbuing them with meaning is nonsense.
Please reconsider your grammar.
> On Sep 22, 2022, at 8:28 PM, Lukas Arsalan wrote:
>
> On 2022-09-22T15:54:31UTC Hans Åberg wrote:
>> Context switches are best avoided unles
