Re: Which one is "better" ?

2005-07-31 Thread Hans Aberg
On 31 Jul 2005, at 01:07, Baldurien (club internet) wrote: I have a grammar to do for my self, and since this grammar add the same expression than the one we could have in a SQL query language, I'm wondering which grammar is better in term of performance. My first one is the classical "

Re[2]: Which one is "better" ?

2005-07-31 Thread Baldurien (club internet)
Bonjour Hans, Le dimanche 31 juillet 2005 à 11:27:43, vous écriviez : HA> On 31 Jul 2005, at 01:07, Baldurien (club internet) wrote: >> I have a grammar to do for my self, and since this grammar add the >> same expression than the one we could have in a SQL query language, >> I'm wonderi

Re: Re[2]: Which one is "better" ?

2005-07-31 Thread Hans Aberg
On 31 Jul 2005, at 18:03, Baldurien (club internet) wrote: Now, I'm asking myself about how bison store the grammar in the produced parser : In class I've seen how to construct the LL(1) table, and the transition table for the automata, but since I've seen it only on paper

Re[4]: Which one is "better" ?

2005-07-31 Thread Baldurien (club internet)
Bonjour Hans, Le dimanche 31 juillet 2005 à 18:43:20, vous écriviez : HA> On 31 Jul 2005, at 18:03, Baldurien (club internet) wrote: >> Now, I'm asking myself about how bison store the grammar in the >> produced parser : >> >> In class I've seen how to construct the LL(1) table,