Re: Help with shift/reduce conflict

2005-03-28 Thread Henrik Sorensen
On Monday 28 March 2005 00.20, Soumitra Kumar wrote: > 1+3.YYID(7) has no meaning. But following is a valid > expression: > (YYID + YYID).YYID().YYID () + YYID() + YYID.YYID() + > YYID.YYID for this reduction to make any sense, you need to show more of your grammar. What kind of operator is '.' in

Re: A simple example of using bison++ and flex++

2005-03-28 Thread Hans Aberg
At 20:14 + 2005/03/27, Belaid MOA wrote: I noticed that there is an interest in having an example of using bison++ and flex++. I also noticed that there is no concrete example in the web (from my search). For this reason, this an example of how to use bison++ and flex++. Are you aware of

Re: A simple example of using bison++ and flex++

2005-03-28 Thread Florent NICART
Hi all, I am receiving a lot of commercial offers through this mailing, so receiving examples about flex++ and bison++ does not matter for me, I find it more relevant ;-) Cheers, Florent. - Original Message - From: "Hans Aberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Belaid MOA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc

RE: Grammar definition problem.

2005-03-28 Thread Vincent Zweije
>> x: letter extension >> >> extension: /* Empty */ >> >> extension: extension letter >> >> extension: extension digit And just for sports: X -> letter X -> X letter X -> X digit Ciao. Vincent. ___ Help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/ma