Hans Aberg wrote:
> With unions, the problem is, if con-/de-structors are non-trivial, that it
> is impossible to know which ones to apply and when.
Stroustrup, _The C++ Programming Language_, Special Edition, 2000,
p. 257, Section 10.4.12:
"Consequently, a union may not have members with constr
At 14:16 +0100 2005/03/23, Laurence Finston wrote:
> The union does not
contain any type information which field is selected. If one adds that,
unions with non-trivial con-/de-Structors would be possible.
Add it where?
Just add a field, invisible to the user, with the type information.
Dynamic
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Hans Aberg wrote:
> At 14:16 +0100 2005/03/23, Laurence Finston wrote:
> >Add it where?
> Just add a field, invisible to the user, with the type information.
I meant "in C++ or in Bison?"
> Dynamic allocations must have such a field with the size, so that it
> can be prope
At 19:34 +0100 2005/03/23, Laurence Finston wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Hans Aberg wrote:
At 14:16 +0100 2005/03/23, Laurence Finston wrote:
>Add it where?
Just add a field, invisible to the user, with the type information.
I meant "in C++ or in Bison?"
In the context, I though you meant exten
