Hey Laurence,
Thanks! that was nice and simple, I should have go that :( earlier!
Regards,
Atul.
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:59:49 +0100 (MET), Laurence Finston
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Atul Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > how do I put the OR part of the rule inconsideration of the
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Hans Aberg wrote:
> They should be OK in C++, as pointers do not have non-trival
> con-/de-structors. The compiler needs to see a declaration of the
> name as a type, though, before it sees the pointer.
If I remember correctly, it has to do with the size of the objects not
be
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, DYP wrote:
> My %union is declared in the following way [...]
>
> %union{
> float fconst;
> int type;
> astNode* node;
> string* name;
> nodeList* list;
>}
>
If you don't mind an unsolicited suggestion,
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Laurence Finston wrote:
> @=%type path_primary@>@/
> [...] in the rule
> `path_primary: SUBPATH numeric_list OF path_primary',
> `$4' can only be a `Path*', cast to `void*'.
This isn't true. The semantic value of a symbol of type
`pointer_value' can be 0, which I've found
Please continue to cc the Help-Bison list, so that more can help.
Often one is using a program like Flex to generate a lexer, a program
that tokenizes the input. Then the Bison generated parser gets token
number to parse. This kind of setup is described, for example, in the
book by Aho, Sethi &
At 10:39 +0100 2005/03/22, Laurence Finston wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Hans Aberg wrote:
They should be OK in C++, as pointers do not have non-trival
con-/de-structors. The compiler needs to see a declaration of the
name as a type, though, before it sees the pointer.
If I remember correctly, it
Hello Dear PayPal Member!
For our Security Problems You
Should Update Your PayPal Account
Please
Click Here To Update Your
Account
Thanks You For Using PayPal!
The PayPal Team
PayPal Email ID PP456
___
Help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/m
