At 17:05 + 2005/06/15, Frans Englich wrote:
> >72 SequenceType: ItemType .
>73 | ItemType . STAR
>74 | ItemType . PLUS
>75 | ItemType . QUESTION_MARK
>
> PLUS shift, and go to state 134
> STAR shift, and g
On Sunday 12 June 2005 18:13, Sylvain Schmitz wrote:
> Frans Englich wrote:
> > state 118
> >
> >72 SequenceType: ItemType .
> >73 | ItemType . STAR
> >74 | ItemType . PLUS
> >75 | ItemType . QUESTION_MARK
> >
> > PLUS shift, and go
Frans Englich wrote:
state 118
72 SequenceType: ItemType .
73 | ItemType . STAR
74 | ItemType . PLUS
75 | ItemType . QUESTION_MARK
PLUS shift, and go to state 134
STAR shift, and go to state 135
QUESTION_MARK shift
look in the output file for all of the 'go to state 118', this will give you
the hints were the grammar are conflicting.
hope this helps
Henrik
On Sunday 12 June 2005 15.04, Frans Englich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my grammar I have 2 shift/reduce conflicts. I could find those by
> staring at my gramma