Ubuntu 16 (gcc 5.4.0): Ok
SLES 12 (gcc 4.8.5): Ok
RHEL 7.7 (gcc 4.8.5): Ok
All report the bison version as 3.5.3.3-6e89b when run.
On 02/04/2020 10:53, Evan Lavelle wrote:
> Hi Akim - yes, that builds cleanly (with no warnings) on Scientific
> Linux 6.10 (an RHEL 6.10 clone), with a default confi
Hi Akim - yes, that builds cleanly (with no warnings) on Scientific
Linux 6.10 (an RHEL 6.10 clone), with a default configure (with '--prefix').
I'll run up some KVMs tonight (GMT+1) and try them, but they're on newer
gcc versions (RHEL7/SLES12 4.8.5, Ubuntu16 5.4.0).
Thanks.
On 02/04/2020 06:3
Hi,
> Le 1 avr. 2020 à 10:12, Evan Lavelle a écrit :
>
> Great - thank you.
Could you please try these?
https://www.lrde.epita.fr/~akim/private/bison/bison-3.5.3.3-6e89b.tar.gz
https://www.lrde.epita.fr/~akim/private/bison/bison-3.5.3.3-6e89b.tar.xz
If it addresses your concern, I'll release
Great - thank you.
On 01/04/2020 07:20, Akim Demaille wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Le 31 mars 2020 à 21:05, EML a écrit :
>>
>> This doesn't compile on RHEL 6.10/gcc 4.4.7, with "#pragma GCC
>> diagnostic not allowed inside functions". I've 'fixed' this with the
>> hack at https://trac.macports.org/ticket/
Hi,
> Le 31 mars 2020 à 21:05, EML a écrit :
>
> This doesn't compile on RHEL 6.10/gcc 4.4.7, with "#pragma GCC
> diagnostic not allowed inside functions". I've 'fixed' this with the
> hack at https://trac.macports.org/ticket/59927.
Why on earth this was never reported before??? This is _bad_
This doesn't compile on RHEL 6.10/gcc 4.4.7, with "#pragma GCC
diagnostic not allowed inside functions". I've 'fixed' this with the
hack at https://trac.macports.org/ticket/59927.
Is this known about/intended? I get the impression from
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bison/2019-10/msg00061.