On 9 Jun 2009, at 00:22, xelanoimis wrote:
I do use Flex and I was also wondering how much faster the -f option
is. The
lexer size jumped from 51KB to 219KB. I don't have yet a big script
to test
on so I wonder if you have any idea if it's worth using.
The best way to know is always some k
The %nonassoc worked fine.
I run bison on WindowsXP, but didn't compile it myself. I downloadable the
binaries. I guess it depends then how they were compiled. Still the ancient
v1.2 needed only bison.exe. Now I have 2 exe, 3 dll, and a bunch of scripts
that are all pretty cryptic to me. But I'm
On 8 Jun 2009, at 22:37, xelanoimis wrote:
All right, I changed the grammar to be more like this ansi c here:
http://www.quut.com/c/ANSI-C-grammar-y.html
And I got rid of the conflicts :) All except the "if else" which I
understand is OK to have.
If it is the dangling "else", you can get rid o
All right, I changed the grammar to be more like this ansi c here:
http://www.quut.com/c/ANSI-C-grammar-y.html
And I got rid of the conflicts :) All except the "if else" which I
understand is OK to have.
The issue with the %%error_verbose was that I had bison v1.24 which didn't
support it.
For
>
> I use --verbose in the command line. I hope it's the same as %error-verbose
> 'cause this one didn't worked.
Use %error-verbose, you can get the more specific error message in your
yyerror.
This is documented in section 4.3 of bison manual.
Option --verbose overrides directive %verbose, it out
On 8 Jun 2009, at 13:10, xelanoimis wrote:
The Bison manual calculator example shows how to do that.
Yeah, I used a special token like that, to force the precedence of
that
particular rule. I'm not sure why didn't work.
I think I'll have to write the grammar better, more like the ansi c
on
Hans Aberg wrote:
>
> The Bison manual calculator example shows how to do that.
>
Yeah, I used a special token like that, to force the precedence of that
particular rule. I'm not sure why didn't work.
I think I'll have to write the grammar better, more like the ansi c one,
with separate rule f
On 8 Jun 2009, at 00:44, xelanoimis wrote:
Thanks for the answers, but I'm still stuck.
I set a few more tokens to %left and reduced the conflicts to 84.
I think some of them may be caused by the unary operators.
Can you please give me an example on my grammar about what should I do
exactly to r
Thanks for the answers, but I'm still stuck.
I set a few more tokens to %left and reduced the conflicts to 84.
I think some of them may be caused by the unary operators.
Can you please give me an example on my grammar about what should I do
exactly to reduce them further?
I uploaded the output f
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 6 Jun 2009, at 23:29, xelanoimis wrote:
>
> I'm updating my scripting language and I need some help from someone more
>> experienced with bison who would like to have a look at my grammar. As it
>> is
>> now it works fine, but I just want to
On 6 Jun 2009, at 23:29, xelanoimis wrote:
I'm updating my scripting language and I need some help from someone
more
experienced with bison who would like to have a look at my grammar.
As it is
now it works fine, but I just want to make sure I didn't do any bad
things
in there. Or if there'
11 matches
Mail list logo
