Thanks Chris! I will do that :)
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Chris verBurg
wrote:
>
> Hmm, you might want to check with the groff guys then. If they are or are
> not really using bison, they'd be able to tell you why. My
> technically-correct-but-less-than-helpful response is limited to "if
Hmm, you might want to check with the groff guys then. If they are or are
not really using bison, they'd be able to tell you why. My
technically-correct-but-less-than-helpful response is limited to "if
groff's grammar is LALR(1), yes you can use bison!" Or to turn on GLR
parsing and watch the wo
Hey Chris,
Thanks so much for your answer.
Indeed, the Stackoverflow question is mine :). Is a bad behavior to post in
multiple forums / lists?.
Regarding the topic, I have seen the groff source code, and although some
pre-processors like `eqn` and `pic` are using bison, groff itself and 95%
of
