Re: can we generate a C++ parser with Bison?

On 27 Jul 2005, at 06:58, Sheng Wang wrote: Since Bison 2.0 can generate GLR parser, can we use this feature to get a C++ parser that can correctly parse C++ programs that conform to the ISO standard? There is an example in the Bison manual on how some of the C++ ambiguities can be resolved

Re: Lexical feedback and lookahead

On Tuesday 19 July 2005 15:01, Evan Lavelle wrote: > Thanks Tim. At first sight, this fix should be exactly what I need; > however, in my case, it doesn't work... :( > > The problem is that COBOL has a real keyword - FUNCTION - to 'lock on' > > to. So, in your production: > > xxx > > > > : { recogn

Re: can we generate a C++ parser with Bison?

Sheng, >Since Bison 2.0 can generate GLR parser, can we use this feature to >get a C++ parser that can correctly parse C++ programs that >conform to the ISO standard? I take it you mean parse C++ programs without having to perform any semantic analysis or building a symbol table. The answer is

can we generate a C++ parser with Bison?

Hi, Since Bison 2.0 can generate GLR parser, can we use this feature to get a C++ parser that can correctly parse C++ programs that conform to the ISO standard? Thanks! - Sheng ___ Help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-biso