[Health-dev] [bug #46665] sex should not be required

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #46665 (project health): We already have the (None,'') option that would be -nearly- equivalent to 'Unknown', that would be available and default when the required state is not set. PS: I admit that there is always a tradeoff in usuability and data quality, and finding t

[Health-dev] [bug #46665] sex should not be required

Follow-up Comment #6, bug #46665 (project health): This goes against your previous statement that said the choice of the sex value should be conscientious. So if None is the default then it is no more a conscientious value that why I propose to add a Unknown value which is not the default and coul

[Health-dev] [bug #46665] sex should not be required

Follow-up Comment #7, bug #46665 (project health): Not, because the already existing (None,'') will be available only when the boolan flag "Needs review" is set (making the gender field not required at that point), and that's where it becomes a deliberated, thought action from the operator. _

[Health-dev] [bug #46665] sex should not be required

Follow-up Comment #8, bug #46665 (project health): I find this design very cumbersome when adding just a value to the selection simple, efficient and error prone. ___ Reply to this item at: