[Health-dev] [bug #46665] sex should not be required

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #46665 (project health): While semantically equivalent, setting the boolean flag requires a deliberate, conscious action from the operator, that detects an anomaly. This minimizes human error, and restricts the values set of the field. A more generic "Needs review" boole

[Health-dev] [bug #46665] sex should not be required

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #46665 (project health): I don't see how having two fields will improve the quality. Setting the field to 'Unknown' is as conscious as setting it to Male or Female. ___ Reply to this item at: