[Health-dev] OT: gnuhealth distro packaging (was: Should distribution packaging solve the installation/configuration issues our users are having?)

* Axel Braun: " Re: [Health-dev] Should distribution packaging solve the installation/configuration issues our users are having?" (Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:41:43 +0100): > OpenBuildService is OpenSource and free to use. It builds Debian and Ubuntu > as well (also on the reference server, build.open

Re: [Health-dev] OT: gnuhealth distro packaging (was: Should distribution packaging solve the installation/configuration issues our users are having?)

2015-02-12 12:44 GMT+01:00 Mathias Behrle : > * Axel Braun: " Re: [Health-dev] Should distribution packaging solve the > installation/configuration issues our users are having?" (Wed, 11 Feb > 2015 > 10:41:43 +0100): > > > OpenBuildService is OpenSource and free to use. It builds Debian and >

Re: [Health-dev] OT: gnuhealth distro packaging (was: Should distribution packaging solve the installation/configuration issues our users are having?)

* Emilien Klein: " Re: [Health-dev] OT: gnuhealth distro packaging (was: Should distribution packaging solve the installation/configuration issues our users are having?)" (Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:36:04 +0100): > 2015-02-12 12:44 GMT+01:00 Mathias Behrle : > > > * Axel Braun: " Re: [Health-dev] Sh

[Health-dev] [bug #44232] The fhir package is incomplete

URL: Summary: The fhir package is incomplete Project: GNU Health Submitted by: cedk Submitted on: Thu 12 Feb 2015 06:15:46 PM CET Category: Installation Severity: 4 - I

[Health-dev] [bug #44232] The fhir package is incomplete

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #44232 (project health): Yeah, sorry about this. Luis and I have been having some discussions about where and how to host the HL7 FHIR server code and the FHIR client code. Also, there are GNU Health independent libraries within the server folder that we feel, naturally,