+1 (non-binding)
- Verified hashes
- LICENSE and NOTICE are included.
- Rat check is ok. `mvn clean apache-rat:check`
- `mvn clean install` works well
slfan1989 于2024年2月2日周五 11:11写道：
> Thank you very much for the review! I will avoid the diff.
>
> Best Regards,
> Shilun Fan.
>
> On Fri, Feb 2,
For more details, see
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch-2.10-java7-linux-x86_64/1292/
No changes
-1 overall
The following subsystems voted -1:
asflicense hadolint mvnsite pathlen unit
The following subsystems voted -1 but
were configured to be filtered/ignored:
cc
Thank you all very much for helping with the review and vote!
I will conclude the voting for Hadoop-thirdparty-1.2.0-RC0 and open the
voting for Hadoop-thirdparty-1.2.0-RC1.
Thank you for the feedback on the code diff, Ayush. I have already
submitted the changes to the Dockerfile and create-relea
Hi folks,
Xiaoqiao He and I have put together a release candidate (RC1) for Hadoop
Thirdparty 1.2.0.
The RC is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hadoop/hadoop-thirdparty-1.2.0-RC1
The RC tag is
https://github.com/apache/hadoop-thirdparty/releases/tag/release-1.2.0-RC1
The mav
For more details, see
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86_64/1492/
[Feb 3, 2024, 11:20:04 AM] (github) HDFS-17369. Add uuid into datanode info for
NameNodeMXBean (#6521) Contributed by Haiyang Hu.
[Feb 3, 2024, 11:26:30 AM] (github) HDFS-17353. Fix failing RBF modul
+1(binding).
I checked the following items:
- [X] Download links are valid.
- [X] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
- [X] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for the repository.
- [X] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
- [X] All files have license headers
Thank you for raising the issue of this long-standing bottleneck, this will
be a very important improvement!
Hopefully can participate and push forward together.
Best Regards~
Brahma Reddy Battula 于2024年2月3日周六 00:40写道：
> Thanks for bringing this and considering all the history around this.
> O
Hi folks,
This is regarding jdk17 pending work to be done. Can we have a new pipeline
for jdk17 builds? I can see that all jira's under HADOOP-17177 which got
merged are not run on jdk17 as of now. It would be helpful if we have
dedicated pipeline.
Thanks,
Bilwa
