Clear enough for me to understand.
Thanks a lot, Harsh!
Peter
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Harsh J wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Peter S wrote:
> > Hi Harsh,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the reply. Some questions are inline.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Harsh J
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Peter S wrote:
> Hi Harsh,
>
> Thanks a lot for the reply. Some questions are inline.
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Harsh J wrote:
>
>> Peter,
>>
>> (Inline)
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Peter S wrote:
>> > I realize the version numbers are a
Hi Harsh,
Thanks a lot for the reply. Some questions are inline.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Harsh J wrote:
> Peter,
>
> (Inline)
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Peter S wrote:
> > I realize the version numbers are actually different branches, e.g.
> > branch-0.21, branch-0.22, branch
Peter,
(Inline)
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Peter S wrote:
> I realize the version numbers are actually different branches, e.g.
> branch-0.21, branch-0.22, branch-0.23, and trunk. I am wondering which
> branch should I use and develop on? Which one is most stable?
All new work is to go to
